Why and How Family Business Research Should Account for Differences Between Public and Private Family Firms

This methodological brief explains why and how family business research should account for public/private ownership to better understand how family control and influence affect firm outcomes. To support our arguments, we review the methodologies used in family business studies and identify four methodological pitfalls that obscure heterogeneity in family firm private/public ownership. We propose practical solutions to address those pitfalls and apply them to a recent study, showing how accounting for private/public ownership alters its empirical findings. The implication of our brief is that more fine-grained methodological attention to public/private family firm ownership will enhance family business research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251373099
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why and How Family Business Research Should Account for Differences Between Public and Private Family Firms

Erik Markin, Trenton A. Williams, William G. Dyer, Steven D. Kofford
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Family Business Performance and Succession
article

Why and How Family Business Research Should Account for Differences Between Public and Private Family Firms

Erik Markin, Trenton A. Williams, William G. Dyer, Steven D. Kofford
article en

Abstract

This methodological brief explains why and how family business research should account for public/private ownership to better understand how family control and influence affect firm outcomes. To support our arguments, we review the methodologies used in family business studies and identify four methodological pitfalls that obscure heterogeneity in family firm private/public ownership. We propose practical solutions to address those pitfalls and apply them to a recent study, showing how accounting for private/public ownership alters its empirical findings. The implication of our brief is that more fine-grained methodological attention to public/private family firm ownership will enhance family business research.

Entrepreneurship Theory and PracticeVol. 50(2)
University of Luxembourg (LU), Mississippi State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Family Business Performance and Succession
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why and How Family Business Research Should Account for Differences Between Public and Private Family Firms — Erik Markin, Trenton A. Williams, et al. · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS