Building appearance and wellbeing: how architectural design affects public emotion
Research was conducted to understand public's views on how they perceive and emotionally respond to building exteriors. This study's methodology involved three phases: a survey of 2,029 participants; a subset of 21 individuals engaged in week-long, in-depth video diary exercises; plus, a second, follow-up survey of 2,000. The dataset was subjected to rigorous analysis employing a range of statistical tools for quantitative/qualitative analysis including thematic coding/classification, frequency, and sentiment analyses of video diary transcripts. Results suggest buildings' appearance impact people's emotional wellbeing. There is a desire for investment in designing buildings that make people feel good when looking at them. Other findings included criticisms of the construction industry, a preference for older buildings and for more restoration/reuse not demolition. Finally, their views on building appearance were associated with sustainability concerns, an under-researched interaction rendering this a novel study. These insights may offer valuable guidance for future urban planning and design.
Authors
- Jane Edwards (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-8478)
- A.J. RAYNER
- Thomas Heatherwick
- Ruth Dalton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9594-1724)
- Lara Gregorians (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-8112)
- Darden Burgess
- Panagiotis Mavros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3027-3072)
- Carol McNaughton Nicholls
- Christoph Hölscher
- Rhianna Duthie
- Elliot Pozza
- Rebecca Burslam
Institutions
- École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay (FR)
- Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology (CH)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- École Normale Supérieure (BI)
- International House (PT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Architectural Science Review
- Published
- 2025-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2025.2558092
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Color perception and design
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.44