The Lehman Sisters Hypothesis: Gender Differences in Risk-taking and Insights from the 2008 Polish Currency Options Crisis

Objective: This study investigates gender differences in risk-taking behaviour, specifically in entrepreneurial decision-making, in line with the Lehman Sisters Hypothesis. The research, motivated by the 2008 Polish currency options crisis, seeks to understand the factors driving risky decisions, examining how both economic and behavioural factors – such as overconfidence and loss aversion – are influenced by the gender of the decision-maker. Research Design & Methods: A survey of entrepreneurs from the Podkarpackie voivodeship (N = 392) was conducted, focusing on behavioural risk attitudes, overconfidence bias, and economic decision-making traits. The survey also addressed behaviours during the 2008 currency options crisis. The collected data were analysed through statistical tests, decision trees, and the logit function, comparing responses between men and women. Findings: The results confirm that men were predominantly responsible for making risky option strategy decisions, often driven by overconfidence and excessive optimism, which led to underestimation of risk. Women, in contrast, were more likely to base their decisions on external advice. These findings align with the Lehman Sisters Hypothesis, suggesting that gender diversity in leadership roles may improve risk management. Implications / Recommendations: The study reinforces the recommendation to reduce gender inequality in leadership, as a greater presence of women in senior roles could contribute to more balanced risk-taking and potentially reduce the likelihood of financial crises. Contribution: This research fills a gap in the literature by exploring gender differences in decision-making during a real-world financial crisis. It highlights the role of behavioural factors such as overconfidence in men and reliance on external advice in women. Additionally, it contributes to understanding gender differences in economic behaviour, including hedging strategies, currency risk exposure, and funding sources utilised by their companies during crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Krakow Review of Economics and Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15678/krem.16700
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Lehman Sisters Hypothesis: Gender Differences in Risk-taking and Insights from the 2008 Polish Currency Options Crisis

Anna Macko, Joanna Wyrobek, Łukasz Faryj, Elżbieta Kubińska
Krakow Review of Economics and Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

The Lehman Sisters Hypothesis: Gender Differences in Risk-taking and Insights from the 2008 Polish Currency Options Crisis

Anna Macko, Joanna Wyrobek, Łukasz Faryj, Elżbieta Kubińska
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates gender differences in risk-taking behaviour, specifically in entrepreneurial decision-making, in line with the Lehman Sisters Hypothesis. The research, motivated by the 2008 Polish currency options crisis, seeks to understand the factors driving risky decisions, examining how both economic and behavioural factors – such as overconfidence and loss aversion – are influenced by the gender of the decision-maker. Research Design & Methods: A survey of entrepreneurs from the Podkarpackie voivodeship (N = 392) was conducted, focusing on behavioural risk attitudes, overconfidence bias, and economic decision-making traits. The survey also addressed behaviours during the 2008 currency options crisis. The collected data were analysed through statistical tests, decision trees, and the logit function, comparing responses between men and women. Findings: The results confirm that men were predominantly responsible for making risky option strategy decisions, often driven by overconfidence and excessive optimism, which led to underestimation of risk. Women, in contrast, were more likely to base their decisions on external advice. These findings align with the Lehman Sisters Hypothesis, suggesting that gender diversity in leadership roles may improve risk management. Implications / Recommendations: The study reinforces the recommendation to reduce gender inequality in leadership, as a greater presence of women in senior roles could contribute to more balanced risk-taking and potentially reduce the likelihood of financial crises. Contribution: This research fills a gap in the literature by exploring gender differences in decision-making during a real-world financial crisis. It highlights the role of behavioural factors such as overconfidence in men and reliance on external advice in women. Additionally, it contributes to understanding gender differences in economic behaviour, including hedging strategies, currency risk exposure, and funding sources utilised by their companies during crises.

Krakow Review of Economics and Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie(3(1009))
Kozminski University (PL), Krakow University of Economics (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.