Making Participation Accessible to All: Evaluating the Redesign of a General Chemistry Lab Course from a Blind Student’s Perspective

Lab courses teaching basic experimental skills are an integral part of most chemistry programs around the world. Given an increasing sensitivity toward diversity, minimizing barriers and enabling participation of all students in lab courses is a central goal of educational efforts. So far, however, few manageable approaches exist that support lecturers in planning, implementing, and evaluating lab courses that enable all students to actively participate. This article presents an approach to redesigning introductory lab experiments enabling more participation in the lab. Based on the NinU framework, a framework developed from a German network for inclusive science education (ger.: Netzwerk inklusiver naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht (NinU)), we illustrate how we adapted experiments to allow blind students to actively participate in an undergraduate lab course. We also present results from a qualitative case study in which the student was interviewed about the success of our redesign. These results reveal that the modifications based on the NinU framework not only largely increased participation but also had unintended effects, such as technical, organizational, physical, and occupational safety issues. We discuss these findings as being of particular value to educators and researchers seeking to increase participation in the laboratory and encourage further research involving all stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00178
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Participation Accessible to All: Evaluating the Redesign of a General Chemistry Lab Course from a Blind Student’s Perspective

Andreas Nehring, Andreas Schneider, Stefanie Lenzer
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Education
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
article

Making Participation Accessible to All: Evaluating the Redesign of a General Chemistry Lab Course from a Blind Student’s Perspective

Andreas Nehring, Andreas Schneider, Stefanie Lenzer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lab courses teaching basic experimental skills are an integral part of most chemistry programs around the world. Given an increasing sensitivity toward diversity, minimizing barriers and enabling participation of all students in lab courses is a central goal of educational efforts. So far, however, few manageable approaches exist that support lecturers in planning, implementing, and evaluating lab courses that enable all students to actively participate. This article presents an approach to redesigning introductory lab experiments enabling more participation in the lab. Based on the NinU framework, a framework developed from a German network for inclusive science education (ger.: Netzwerk inklusiver naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht (NinU)), we illustrate how we adapted experiments to allow blind students to actively participate in an undergraduate lab course. We also present results from a qualitative case study in which the student was interviewed about the success of our redesign. These results reveal that the modifications based on the NinU framework not only largely increased participation but also had unintended effects, such as technical, organizational, physical, and occupational safety issues. We discuss these findings as being of particular value to educators and researchers seeking to increase participation in the laboratory and encourage further research involving all stakeholders.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 102(10)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.