Exponential Growth Bias in an Inflationary World

This paper examines the exponential growth bias (EGB), both compound savings questions and in a domain relevant to household finance: inflation-based questions. Here, we test a broad-based sample of 354 adults living in the US initially on estimates for future compound savings and future prices after inflation over time. Here, we find significant EGB in both domains with and without calculators, with significantly higher bias sizes in the inflation questions. After the initial results, each participant completed a short 5 to 10-minute tutorial designed to teach them about EGB. We split the overall participants into two random learning groups: One group was shown how to use interactive charts while the other group learned the formal formula. While we do not find any significant differences of improvements between the two learning groups, we find significantly large decreases in bias sizes in both savings and inflation questions after the tutorial, with and without a calculator, particularly for those who did not know how to make the correct calculation before the tutorial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Business and Economics
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v27i4.7877
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exponential Growth Bias in an Inflationary World

Bryan Foltice
Journal of Applied Business and Economics
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Exponential Growth Bias in an Inflationary World

Bryan Foltice
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the exponential growth bias (EGB), both compound savings questions and in a domain relevant to household finance: inflation-based questions. Here, we test a broad-based sample of 354 adults living in the US initially on estimates for future compound savings and future prices after inflation over time. Here, we find significant EGB in both domains with and without calculators, with significantly higher bias sizes in the inflation questions. After the initial results, each participant completed a short 5 to 10-minute tutorial designed to teach them about EGB. We split the overall participants into two random learning groups: One group was shown how to use interactive charts while the other group learned the formal formula. While we do not find any significant differences of improvements between the two learning groups, we find significantly large decreases in bias sizes in both savings and inflation questions after the tutorial, with and without a calculator, particularly for those who did not know how to make the correct calculation before the tutorial.

Journal of Applied Business and EconomicsVol. 27(4)
Butler University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exponential Growth Bias in an Inflationary World — Bryan Foltice · Journal of Applied Business and Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS