Interindividual variability in flower pickiness by foraging bumblebees

Abstract Pollinators navigate complex and heterogeneous “flower markets”, where floral resources vary in quality, availability, and spatial distribution. Bumblebees, as generalist foragers, visit numerous flowers during their foraging bouts, yet the factors influencing their flower choices and the individual differences in foraging behaviour remain poorly understood. Here, we tested how bees adjust their foraging in response to different reward structures. Bombus terrestris workers completed three foraging bouts in two artificial flower environments: one simulating a favourable environment with patches alternating high- and low-quality flowers (40% vs. 20% w/w sucrose solution), and the other a challenging environment with high-quality flowers alongside unrewarded ones (40% w/w sucrose solution vs. plain water). We hypothesised that bees would improve their foraging efficiency in both environments, but more rapidly in the more extreme one, where the greater reward difference creates stronger pressure to learn quickly. In both conditions, bees increased their sucrose intake per unit time over bouts. We also observed consistent differences in flower selectivity among individuals: in the favourable environment, bees that first visited high-quality flowers focused on them and avoided low-quality ones (became “picky”), while bees that first visited low-quality flowers kept visiting both types. Despite these differences, bees across environments and pickiness levels all reached similar sucrose intake rates by the third foraging bout, either by becoming more selective, collecting more sucrose solution, or reducing time spent foraging. These findings highlight the adaptability of bee foraging and suggest that early flower experiences may contribute to lasting individual differences in foraging behaviour. Significance statement Bumblebees are highly efficient pollinators of wild plants and commercial crops, yet their foraging behaviour varies notably among individuals. Understanding why bees differ in their foraging decisions is crucial, as it affects how they collect resources. We show that individual Bombus terrestris workers rapidly adapt to flower patches with different reward qualities. Remarkably, a bee’s first flower visits have lasting effects: individuals that started with high-quality flowers consistently favoured them and avoided low-quality ones, while those that started with low-quality flowers continued to visit both types over time. Despite these differences, bees reached similar nectar intake rates after just three foraging trips, regardless of how selective they were. Our findings show that bees can quickly adjust their foraging behaviour, and that early experiences play a key role in how they exploit resources across different environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-025-03643-y
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interindividual variability in flower pickiness by foraging bumblebees

Tomer J. Czaczkes, Mélissa Armand, Mathieu Lihoreau, Aurore Avarguès‐Weber et al.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Plant and animal studies
article

Interindividual variability in flower pickiness by foraging bumblebees

Tomer J. Czaczkes, Mélissa Armand, Mathieu Lihoreau, Aurore Avarguès‐Weber, Christoph Beckenbauer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pollinators navigate complex and heterogeneous “flower markets”, where floral resources vary in quality, availability, and spatial distribution. Bumblebees, as generalist foragers, visit numerous flowers during their foraging bouts, yet the factors influencing their flower choices and the individual differences in foraging behaviour remain poorly understood. Here, we tested how bees adjust their foraging in response to different reward structures. Bombus terrestris workers completed three foraging bouts in two artificial flower environments: one simulating a favourable environment with patches alternating high- and low-quality flowers (40% vs. 20% w/w sucrose solution), and the other a challenging environment with high-quality flowers alongside unrewarded ones (40% w/w sucrose solution vs. plain water). We hypothesised that bees would improve their foraging efficiency in both environments, but more rapidly in the more extreme one, where the greater reward difference creates stronger pressure to learn quickly. In both conditions, bees increased their sucrose intake per unit time over bouts. We also observed consistent differences in flower selectivity among individuals: in the favourable environment, bees that first visited high-quality flowers focused on them and avoided low-quality ones (became “picky”), while bees that first visited low-quality flowers kept visiting both types. Despite these differences, bees across environments and pickiness levels all reached similar sucrose intake rates by the third foraging bout, either by becoming more selective, collecting more sucrose solution, or reducing time spent foraging. These findings highlight the adaptability of bee foraging and suggest that early flower experiences may contribute to lasting individual differences in foraging behaviour. Significance statement Bumblebees are highly efficient pollinators of wild plants and commercial crops, yet their foraging behaviour varies notably among individuals. Understanding why bees differ in their foraging decisions is crucial, as it affects how they collect resources. We show that individual Bombus terrestris workers rapidly adapt to flower patches with different reward qualities. Remarkably, a bee’s first flower visits have lasting effects: individuals that started with high-quality flowers consistently favoured them and avoided low-quality ones, while those that started with low-quality flowers continued to visit both types over time. Despite these differences, bees reached similar nectar intake rates after just three foraging trips, regardless of how selective they were. Our findings show that bees can quickly adjust their foraging behaviour, and that early experiences play a key role in how they exploit resources across different environments.

Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyVol. 79(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (FR), University of Regensburg (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Harvard University, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.