Treating Substance Use Disorder in Individuals With Intellectual Disability: A Regional System Capacity Assessment

This mixed-methods study assessed substance use disorder (SUD) treatment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities within California's regional center system. The system is the primary organization in California that coordinates and monitors services for these individuals. Data were solicited from the 21 service centers in the system and six vendored programs overseeing SUD services. This article reports on those programs and analyzes qualitative data from seven service coordinators regarding overall SUD treatment. Both the programs and the coordinators identified 0barriers to treatment, such as a lack of training and inadequate service structures. Despite being formal referral targets, these programs often only offered adaptations for physical access. Proposed solutions included interagency collaboration and adopting a biopsychosocial model of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-63.5.384
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treating Substance Use Disorder in Individuals With Intellectual Disability: A Regional System Capacity Assessment

Lori Ann Eldridge, Kristin Hamre, Jon D. Agley, Derek Nord et al.
Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Treating Substance Use Disorder in Individuals With Intellectual Disability: A Regional System Capacity Assessment

Lori Ann Eldridge, Kristin Hamre, Jon D. Agley, Derek Nord, Jennifer Piatt
article en

Abstract

This mixed-methods study assessed substance use disorder (SUD) treatment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities within California's regional center system. The system is the primary organization in California that coordinates and monitors services for these individuals. Data were solicited from the 21 service centers in the system and six vendored programs overseeing SUD services. This article reports on those programs and analyzes qualitative data from seven service coordinators regarding overall SUD treatment. Both the programs and the coordinators identified 0barriers to treatment, such as a lack of training and inadequate service structures. Despite being formal referral targets, these programs often only offered adaptations for physical access. Proposed solutions included interagency collaboration and adopting a biopsychosocial model of care.

Intellectual and developmental disabilitiesVol. 63(5)
East Carolina University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.