“Easier Said Than Done”: A Qualitative Investigation of Black Emerging Adults Coping With Multilevel Racism

OBJECTIVES: This qualitative investigation examined how Black emerging adults cope with their worst experiences of racism at multiple levels (individual, cultural, and institutional). METHODS: A sample of 189 Black emerging adults (M age = 19.34, 68.3% female) from a predominantly White institution completed an online questionnaire with an open-ended question regarding their worst experience of racism and how they coped. Responses to these questions were coded using deductive coding schemes based on established theory-Jones' (1997) tripartite model of racism and Harrell's (2000) typology of coping. RESULTS: Results indicated that the majority of participants utilized active and inner-directed coping strategies in response to their worst experience. More participants responded to institutional-level racism with active rather than passive coping. There were no differences in proportions of participants who responded to individual- or cultural-level racism with active rather than passive coping. Similar proportions of participants also reported inner-directed versus outer-directed coping in response to individual-, cultural-, and institutional-level experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for practice, policy, and programming to support the mental health of Black emerging adults are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/czmn-er45
Primary Topic
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Easier Said Than Done”: A Qualitative Investigation of Black Emerging Adults Coping With Multilevel Racism

Vanessa V. Volpe, Dalal Katsiaficas, Aaron J. Neal
UNC Libraries
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
article

“Easier Said Than Done”: A Qualitative Investigation of Black Emerging Adults Coping With Multilevel Racism

Vanessa V. Volpe, Dalal Katsiaficas, Aaron J. Neal
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This qualitative investigation examined how Black emerging adults cope with their worst experiences of racism at multiple levels (individual, cultural, and institutional). METHODS: A sample of 189 Black emerging adults (M age = 19.34, 68.3% female) from a predominantly White institution completed an online questionnaire with an open-ended question regarding their worst experience of racism and how they coped. Responses to these questions were coded using deductive coding schemes based on established theory-Jones' (1997) tripartite model of racism and Harrell's (2000) typology of coping. RESULTS: Results indicated that the majority of participants utilized active and inner-directed coping strategies in response to their worst experience. More participants responded to institutional-level racism with active rather than passive coping. There were no differences in proportions of participants who responded to individual- or cultural-level racism with active rather than passive coping. Similar proportions of participants also reported inner-directed versus outer-directed coping in response to individual-, cultural-, and institutional-level experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for practice, policy, and programming to support the mental health of Black emerging adults are discussed.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.