Drying Behavior of Ready to Reconstitute Chickpea ( <i>Cicer arietinum</i> L.): Modeling and Rehydration

ABSTRACT This study focused on analyzing the thin‐layer drying characteristics of both cooked and soaked chickpeas using a forced convection solar dryer, with experiments conducted at different drying temperatures (50°C, 60°C, 70°C, and 80°C) and air flow velocities (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 m/s). Drying in both types occurred entirely with the falling rate period, indicating diffusion control of moisture. Increased drying temperature and air velocity decreased drying time, while temperature having a stronger impact. The Exponential as well as Page models were fitted to each experimental run, with Page's model demonstrated superior performance, consistently achieving a higher coefficient of determination ( r ² = 0.998–0.999) and lower reduced chi‐square values (χ² = 0.565 × 10⁻⁴ to 2.268 × 10⁻⁴) across all drying conditions for both cooked and soaked chickpeas. The drying constants k and n of Page's model were estimated under all conditions. The dependence of the drying constant k on drying air temperature and velocity was described using both the Arrhenius equation and Power law models which shows, increasing from 0.1396 to 0.4541 h⁻¹ for cooked chickpeas as the temperature rose from 50°C to 80°C at a constant air velocity of 0.25 m/s. Arrhenius equation provided better fit compared to the Power model, as evidenced by higher r² and lower Chi‐square ( χ 2 ) values. Cooked chickpeas had a higher initial moisture content (205%–215% d.b.) compared to soaked chickpeas (139%–148% d.b.) and required longer drying durations (6–21 h depending on conditions). However, cooked samples showed better rehydration behavior, with rehydration ratios up to 2.42, whereas soaked samples achieved a maximum of 1.89, indicating greater structural integrity post‐drying. Sensory evaluation favored drying at with moderate temperature and airflow. Cooked chickpeas had better texture and flavor, while soaked ones retained more color and taste.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heat Transfer
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.70084
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drying Behavior of Ready to Reconstitute Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.): Modeling and Rehydration

P.N. Sarsavadia, Devanand Gojiya, Krishna Vaja, U. D. Dobariya
Heat Transfer
Food composition and properties
article

Drying Behavior of Ready to Reconstitute Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.): Modeling and Rehydration

P.N. Sarsavadia, Devanand Gojiya, Krishna Vaja, U. D. Dobariya
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study focused on analyzing the thin‐layer drying characteristics of both cooked and soaked chickpeas using a forced convection solar dryer, with experiments conducted at different drying temperatures (50°C, 60°C, 70°C, and 80°C) and air flow velocities (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 m/s). Drying in both types occurred entirely with the falling rate period, indicating diffusion control of moisture. Increased drying temperature and air velocity decreased drying time, while temperature having a stronger impact. The Exponential as well as Page models were fitted to each experimental run, with Page's model demonstrated superior performance, consistently achieving a higher coefficient of determination ( r ² = 0.998–0.999) and lower reduced chi‐square values (χ² = 0.565 × 10⁻⁴ to 2.268 × 10⁻⁴) across all drying conditions for both cooked and soaked chickpeas. The drying constants k and n of Page's model were estimated under all conditions. The dependence of the drying constant k on drying air temperature and velocity was described using both the Arrhenius equation and Power law models which shows, increasing from 0.1396 to 0.4541 h⁻¹ for cooked chickpeas as the temperature rose from 50°C to 80°C at a constant air velocity of 0.25 m/s. Arrhenius equation provided better fit compared to the Power model, as evidenced by higher r² and lower Chi‐square ( χ 2 ) values. Cooked chickpeas had a higher initial moisture content (205%–215% d.b.) compared to soaked chickpeas (139%–148% d.b.) and required longer drying durations (6–21 h depending on conditions). However, cooked samples showed better rehydration behavior, with rehydration ratios up to 2.42, whereas soaked samples achieved a maximum of 1.89, indicating greater structural integrity post‐drying. Sensory evaluation favored drying at with moderate temperature and airflow. Cooked chickpeas had better texture and flavor, while soaked ones retained more color and taste.

Heat TransferVol. 55(1)
Junagadh Agricultural University (IN), Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.