Native and non-native monumental trees in cultural landscapes: a spatially heterogeneous source of biodiversity

• The monumental tree community in cultural landscapes is multifaceted. • Spatial clustering across Italy highlights hotspots of monumental trees. • Urban areas host the highest number of non-native monumental trees. • Discrepancies in monumentality criteria between natives and non-native species. Monumental trees hold considerable ecological, cultural, and socio-economic values, providing crucial ecosystem services. Updated catalogues of monumental trees represent an essential starting point for the study and appropriate management of these entities. This study offers comprehensive insights into the composition, distribution, and ecological significance of the Italian monumental tree community. We used the Italian monumental trees inventory (4657 spatially explicit records) provided by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty, and Forestry. While native species dominate the monumental trees community, the noteworthy presence of non-native trees highlights ecological and historical dynamics at the national scale. Non-native species dominate the urban monumental trees community. Spatial analysis reveals clustering of monumental trees at provincial and local levels, suggesting the existence of biodiversity and cultural hotspots (e.g., parks, churches, historic villas, and royal palaces). We showed discrepancies concerning the application of monumentality criteria between native and non-native species, which also depend on their surrounding environment (e.g., urban settings favoring historical and architectural significance criteria). Native species are positively associated with criteria used to identify monumental trees such as age, circumference, crown size, shape, and ecological value, while non-native species are linked with historical, landscape, architectural, and botanical rarity values. Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of the monumental tree community.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Trees Forests and People
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Native and non-native monumental trees in cultural landscapes: a spatially heterogeneous source of biodiversity

Giuseppe Brundu, D. Johan Kotze, Yoan Paillet, Thomas Campagnaro et al.
1 citations
Trees Forests and People
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
1.67
article

Native and non-native monumental trees in cultural landscapes: a spatially heterogeneous source of biodiversity

Giuseppe Brundu, D. Johan Kotze, Yoan Paillet, Thomas Campagnaro, Tommaso Sitzia, Nicola La Porta, Paolo Semenzato, María Cristina Monteverdi, N G Menon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The monumental tree community in cultural landscapes is multifaceted. • Spatial clustering across Italy highlights hotspots of monumental trees. • Urban areas host the highest number of non-native monumental trees. • Discrepancies in monumentality criteria between natives and non-native species. Monumental trees hold considerable ecological, cultural, and socio-economic values, providing crucial ecosystem services. Updated catalogues of monumental trees represent an essential starting point for the study and appropriate management of these entities. This study offers comprehensive insights into the composition, distribution, and ecological significance of the Italian monumental tree community. We used the Italian monumental trees inventory (4657 spatially explicit records) provided by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty, and Forestry. While native species dominate the monumental trees community, the noteworthy presence of non-native trees highlights ecological and historical dynamics at the national scale. Non-native species dominate the urban monumental trees community. Spatial analysis reveals clustering of monumental trees at provincial and local levels, suggesting the existence of biodiversity and cultural hotspots (e.g., parks, churches, historic villas, and royal palaces). We showed discrepancies concerning the application of monumentality criteria between native and non-native species, which also depend on their surrounding environment (e.g., urban settings favoring historical and architectural significance criteria). Native species are positively associated with criteria used to identify monumental trees such as age, circumference, crown size, shape, and ecological value, while non-native species are linked with historical, landscape, architectural, and botanical rarity values. Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of the monumental tree community.

Trees Forests and PeopleVol. 22
Università degli Studi di Padova
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.