Performance of polypropylene fiber in compacted residual soil for pavement applications

Growing infrastructure demands necessitate cost-effective alternatives to conventional soil stabilization methods that often involve high energy consumption and environmental impacts. Therefore, this study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by investigating the performance enhancement of residual soil using discrete and strand polypropylene fibers for road subgrade and fill applications, addressing the need for alternative materials to conventional stabilization methods. Laboratory testing was conducted on soil specimens reinforced with varying Fiber contents (0.6-3.0%) and lime content (8%). California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) tests assessed fundamental mechanical properties, while large-scale model tests in a wooden steel-braced box (460 × 410 × 1000 mm) evaluated static and dynamic load responses under simulated field conditions. CBR improvements of 25.05% and 19.13% were achieved for discrete and strand Fibers, respectively, under unsoaked conditions. ITS tests revealed maximum tensile strengths of 37.45 kPa at 1.8% strand Fiber content and 30.8 kPa at 2.4% discrete Fiber content. Static bearing capacity at 25–50 mm settlement improved with 1.8–2.4% strand and 3.0% discrete Fiber reinforcement. Dynamic loading tests showed that unreinforced and lime-stabilized soils exhibited higher initial stiffness through 250 loading cycles. However, beyond this threshold, fiber-reinforced specimens demonstrated a better performance due to enhanced ductility, with 1.8% discrete Fiber reinforcement showing minimal cumulative settlement. Contrary to theoretical expectations, fiber-lime combinations did not demonstrate synergistic benefits. Lime-stabilized pavement section has a lower cumulative settlement than discrete and strand fibers under equivalent loading cycles. These findings provide practical guidance for field engineers when selecting appropriate reinforcement strategies for various loading conditions and performance requirements in unpaved road applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Civil Engineering
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-025-00333-6
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of polypropylene fiber in compacted residual soil for pavement applications

Olivier Félix, Adesola Habeeb Adegoke, Sinenkosi Nxumalo
Discover Civil Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Performance of polypropylene fiber in compacted residual soil for pavement applications

Olivier Félix, Adesola Habeeb Adegoke, Sinenkosi Nxumalo
article en

Abstract

Growing infrastructure demands necessitate cost-effective alternatives to conventional soil stabilization methods that often involve high energy consumption and environmental impacts. Therefore, this study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by investigating the performance enhancement of residual soil using discrete and strand polypropylene fibers for road subgrade and fill applications, addressing the need for alternative materials to conventional stabilization methods. Laboratory testing was conducted on soil specimens reinforced with varying Fiber contents (0.6-3.0%) and lime content (8%). California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) tests assessed fundamental mechanical properties, while large-scale model tests in a wooden steel-braced box (460 × 410 × 1000 mm) evaluated static and dynamic load responses under simulated field conditions. CBR improvements of 25.05% and 19.13% were achieved for discrete and strand Fibers, respectively, under unsoaked conditions. ITS tests revealed maximum tensile strengths of 37.45 kPa at 1.8% strand Fiber content and 30.8 kPa at 2.4% discrete Fiber content. Static bearing capacity at 25–50 mm settlement improved with 1.8–2.4% strand and 3.0% discrete Fiber reinforcement. Dynamic loading tests showed that unreinforced and lime-stabilized soils exhibited higher initial stiffness through 250 loading cycles. However, beyond this threshold, fiber-reinforced specimens demonstrated a better performance due to enhanced ductility, with 1.8% discrete Fiber reinforcement showing minimal cumulative settlement. Contrary to theoretical expectations, fiber-lime combinations did not demonstrate synergistic benefits. Lime-stabilized pavement section has a lower cumulative settlement than discrete and strand fibers under equivalent loading cycles. These findings provide practical guidance for field engineers when selecting appropriate reinforcement strategies for various loading conditions and performance requirements in unpaved road applications.

Discover Civil EngineeringVol. 2(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Arizona State University (US)
University of Johannesburg, AfriSam
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.