Time Series Empirical Analysis of Tactical Formation Preferences in Football Management

This study examined the impact of tactical formations on match success based on a comprehensive dataset of 66,143 professional football matches played in 44 European countries affiliated with UEFA between 2013 and 2025. The study analysed the frequency of use of 30 different formations by home and away teams and the scoring performance of these formations in matches. The most frequently used formations are 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, and 4-4-2, which are evaluated in detail in terms of prevalence and average points. The 4-2-3-1 formation stood out regarding usage intensity and its scoring advantage against various opposing formations. In contrast, the offensive potential of the 4-3-3 formation created significant differences in favour of the home team in some matches. Analysis based on formation matchups shows that home teams have an average advantage in all matchups; for example, in the 4-3-3/5-3-2 matchup, the home team's average score reached 2.016, while the away team's average score remained at 0.782. The findings reveal formation preferences and which formations are played against impact match success; this highlights the critical role of data-driven tactical analyses as decision-support tools for coaches. This study, which we expect to serve as a guide for coaches, was conducted using a dataset that can be considered big data in the literature. The findings aim to support coaches in developing data-driven strategies during competition preparation periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avrasya Spor Bilimleri ve Eğitim Dergisi
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47778/ejsse.1760201
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time Series Empirical Analysis of Tactical Formation Preferences in Football Management

Cemal Özman, Taner Karaman
1 citations
Avrasya Spor Bilimleri ve Eğitim Dergisi
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Time Series Empirical Analysis of Tactical Formation Preferences in Football Management

Cemal Özman, Taner Karaman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examined the impact of tactical formations on match success based on a comprehensive dataset of 66,143 professional football matches played in 44 European countries affiliated with UEFA between 2013 and 2025. The study analysed the frequency of use of 30 different formations by home and away teams and the scoring performance of these formations in matches. The most frequently used formations are 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, and 4-4-2, which are evaluated in detail in terms of prevalence and average points. The 4-2-3-1 formation stood out regarding usage intensity and its scoring advantage against various opposing formations. In contrast, the offensive potential of the 4-3-3 formation created significant differences in favour of the home team in some matches. Analysis based on formation matchups shows that home teams have an average advantage in all matchups; for example, in the 4-3-3/5-3-2 matchup, the home team's average score reached 2.016, while the away team's average score remained at 0.782. The findings reveal formation preferences and which formations are played against impact match success; this highlights the critical role of data-driven tactical analyses as decision-support tools for coaches. This study, which we expect to serve as a guide for coaches, was conducted using a dataset that can be considered big data in the literature. The findings aim to support coaches in developing data-driven strategies during competition preparation periods.

Avrasya Spor Bilimleri ve Eğitim DergisiVol. 7(2)
Bartin University (TR), Okan University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.