A Coupled Hydrological‐Hydrodynamic Modelling Approach for Assessing the Impacts of Multiple Natural Flood Management Interventions on Downstream Flooding

ABSTRACT While natural flood management (NFM) as a flood mitigation strategy is becoming widely used, there remains a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of different NFM scenarios under high flow events. To demonstrate how different types and extents of NFM interventions interact to flood peaks at larger catchment scales, combined scenarios of existing NFM interventions and an ideal maximum woodland scenario were modelled in the Upper Aire, northern England, using a coupled model that integrates Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL (SD‐TOPMODEL) with a 2D hydrodynamic model (Flood Modeller 2D) at an 81.4 km 2 catchment. The coupled model exhibited a strong fit with observed data (NSE up to 0.95), effectively capturing flood peaks and peak shapes. Leaky dams were found to be more effective at delaying flood peaks with mean values ranging from 8.6 to 60 min than reducing peak discharge (mean values ranging from 0.53% to 1.84%), though these effects were inversely proportional and influenced by tributary characteristics such as channel gradient. Simulations applying multiple NFM interventions consistently demonstrated positive flood mitigation impacts, including reduced peak discharge up to 2.59% and delayed peaks up to 30 min, while inundation depths reduced by 0.5 m in most areas, with inundation extent reduction at critical points in an urban area. The study demonstrated the utility of the coupled model for evaluating NFM strategies while emphasising the need for further validation and exploration of systematic interventions at larger catchment scales. By providing insights into the interactions between NFM interventions and catchment characteristics, this research contributes to the optimisation of flood risk management strategies and informs future policy development.