How FAIR is metadata for human pluripotent stem cells?

The rapid and global expansion of stem cell research over the last two decades necessitates coordinated and effective management of information describing stem cell lines and accompanying data resources. Here, we evaluate the maturity of the field by applying FAIR data principles-findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable-to assess the quality of information describing human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) in dedicated data infrastructure. We identified a lack of coordination across different jurisdictions that prevents effective information sharing, such as the absence of persistent digital identifiers, inconsistent data standards, and restrictive sharing policies. Using Australia, the United States, Japan, and Europe as case studies, we underscore the need for national infrastructure to support comprehensive cell line cataloging. This is the first systematic evaluation of FAIR principles in the field and indicates that improving metadata standardization and cross-platform coordination will enhance data reuse and strengthen the value of local resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stem Cell Reports
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2025.102644
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How FAIR is metadata for human pluripotent stem cells?

Dan Santos, Mengqi Hu, Christine A. Wells, Rachel A. Ankeny
2 citations
Stem Cell Reports
Research Data Management Practices
6.49
article

How FAIR is metadata for human pluripotent stem cells?

Dan Santos, Mengqi Hu, Christine A. Wells, Rachel A. Ankeny
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The rapid and global expansion of stem cell research over the last two decades necessitates coordinated and effective management of information describing stem cell lines and accompanying data resources. Here, we evaluate the maturity of the field by applying FAIR data principles-findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable-to assess the quality of information describing human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) in dedicated data infrastructure. We identified a lack of coordination across different jurisdictions that prevents effective information sharing, such as the absence of persistent digital identifiers, inconsistent data standards, and restrictive sharing policies. Using Australia, the United States, Japan, and Europe as case studies, we underscore the need for national infrastructure to support comprehensive cell line cataloging. This is the first systematic evaluation of FAIR principles in the field and indicates that improving metadata standardization and cross-platform coordination will enhance data reuse and strengthen the value of local resources.

Stem Cell ReportsVol. 20(10)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Stem Cells Australia (AU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Research Data Management Practices
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.