Concordance of an Artificial Intelligence Model (ChatGPT 4.0) with Physician Decisions in Smoking Cessation Clinics: A Comparative Evaluation

<b>Background:</b> Smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable mortality worldwide. Smoking cessation treatments require personalized therapeutic approaches. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in clinical decision support systems; however, its role in smoking cessation treatment remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the concordance between ChatGPT-4.0-generated treatment recommendations and physician decisions in smoking cessation therapy. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective and descriptive study was conducted by reviewing the electronic records of patients who presented to a Smoking Cessation Clinic. The ChatGPT-4.0 model was used to compare AI-generated treatment recommendations with physician-prescribed therapies. Concordance rates and the quality of AI-generated information (inappropriate, useful, or perfect information) were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0. <b>Results:</b> A total of 82 patient records were analyzed. The mean age was 40.71 ± 12.87 years (range: 19-69). The overall concordance rate between physicians and ChatGPT-4.0 was 67.1%. Regarding ChatGPT-4.0-generated information quality, 32.9% of cases received inappropriate recommendations, 36.6% received useful recommendations, and 30.5% received optimal recommendations. ChatGPT-4.0 provided inappropriate recommendations in 81.5% of cases involving chronic diseases and 77.8% of cases involving regular medication use (<i>p</i> = 0.021, <i>p</i> = 0.030, respectively). ChatGPT-4.0 achieved the highest rate of optimal recommendations (52.0%) for cytisine therapy. <b>Conclusions:</b> ChatGPT-4.0 can serve as a supportive tool in smoking cessation treatment. However, it remains insufficient in managing complex clinical cases, emphasizing the necessity of physician oversight in final decision-making. Enhancing AI models with larger and more diverse datasets may improve the accuracy of treatment recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182283
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concordance of an Artificial Intelligence Model (ChatGPT 4.0) with Physician Decisions in Smoking Cessation Clinics: A Comparative Evaluation

Yağmur Gökseven, Güzin Zeren Öztürk
Healthcare
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Concordance of an Artificial Intelligence Model (ChatGPT 4.0) with Physician Decisions in Smoking Cessation Clinics: A Comparative Evaluation

Yağmur Gökseven, Güzin Zeren Öztürk
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable mortality worldwide. Smoking cessation treatments require personalized therapeutic approaches. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in clinical decision support systems; however, its role in smoking cessation treatment remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the concordance between ChatGPT-4.0-generated treatment recommendations and physician decisions in smoking cessation therapy. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective and descriptive study was conducted by reviewing the electronic records of patients who presented to a Smoking Cessation Clinic. The ChatGPT-4.0 model was used to compare AI-generated treatment recommendations with physician-prescribed therapies. Concordance rates and the quality of AI-generated information (inappropriate, useful, or perfect information) were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0. <b>Results:</b> A total of 82 patient records were analyzed. The mean age was 40.71 ± 12.87 years (range: 19-69). The overall concordance rate between physicians and ChatGPT-4.0 was 67.1%. Regarding ChatGPT-4.0-generated information quality, 32.9% of cases received inappropriate recommendations, 36.6% received useful recommendations, and 30.5% received optimal recommendations. ChatGPT-4.0 provided inappropriate recommendations in 81.5% of cases involving chronic diseases and 77.8% of cases involving regular medication use (<i>p</i> = 0.021, <i>p</i> = 0.030, respectively). ChatGPT-4.0 achieved the highest rate of optimal recommendations (52.0%) for cytisine therapy. <b>Conclusions:</b> ChatGPT-4.0 can serve as a supportive tool in smoking cessation treatment. However, it remains insufficient in managing complex clinical cases, emphasizing the necessity of physician oversight in final decision-making. Enhancing AI models with larger and more diverse datasets may improve the accuracy of treatment recommendations.

HealthcareVol. 13(18)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Şişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.