Early postoperative outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs open haemorrhoidectomy in second and third degree haemorrhoids: a comparative study

Background: Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common anorectal disease affecting millions of people around the world and represents a major medical and socioeconomic problem, severely affecting patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to compare the early outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of second and third degree haemorrhoids. Methods: In this study, adult patients who presented to the general surgery outpatient clinics in BIRDEM General Hospital with symptomatic second and third degree hemorrhoid along with patients who agreed to continue follow[1] up for 6 weeks were included. This study was carried out from May 2023 to October 2024 after ethical clearance from Intitutional reiview board of BIRDEM General Hospital. Patients follow up was on the first post operative day, after 1 week and after 6 weeks. This was a quasi experimental study, sampling method was convenience sampling and patients were treated by either stapled haemorrhoidopexy (n=32) or open haemorrhoidectomy (n=32). The total sample size was 64. Data were collected by using a questionnaire for the study by researcher herself. Data processing and analysis were done using SPSS (statistical package for social sciences), version 26. Results: To evaluate the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) and open haemorrhoidectomy (OH), 64 patients were compared for age, comorbidities and results. The average operation duration for OH was much lower (27.6 ± 5.6 minutes) than for SH (34.0 ± 6.12 minutes). In the SH group, 96.9% (31 patients) had intraoperative bleeding under 30 ml, compared to 87.5% (28 patients) in the OH group, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.355). The SH group had significantly lower pain scores on the 1st and 7th postoperative days (3.97 ± 0.47) and (2.19 ± 0.78) compared to the OH group (4.84 ± 0.98 and 2.94 ± 0.87, respectively) (p=0.001). All OH patients needed sitz bath for more than 7 days, while only 6.3% of SH patients did (p=0.001). The SH group had no wound infections on the 7th postoperative day, compared to 12.5% in the OH group (p=0.162). The SH group had a shorter hospital stay (1.09 ± 0.2 days) than the OH group (1.23 ± 0.4 days), however the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.182). The SH group returned to normal activities significantly earlier (2.63 ± 0.8 days) than the OH group (4.28 ± 1.2 days) (p=0.001). SH patients were 37.5% satisfied and rated as excellent with their findings, compared to 9.4% of OH patients. Conclusion: Overall, stapled haemorrhoidopexy demonstrated advantages in terms of postoperative pain, recovery time, and patient satisfaction, whereas open haemorrhoidectomy showed shorter operative times. BIRDEM Med J 2025; 15(3): 103-110

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BIRDEM Medical Journal
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/birdem.v15i3.84510
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early postoperative outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs open haemorrhoidectomy in second and third degree haemorrhoids: a comparative study

Md Manir Hossain Khan, Mst. Shahnaz Parvin, Shanjida Rahman Shorna, Saad-ur-Rahman Sarwar et al.
BIRDEM Medical Journal
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Early postoperative outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs open haemorrhoidectomy in second and third degree haemorrhoids: a comparative study

Md Manir Hossain Khan, Mst. Shahnaz Parvin, Shanjida Rahman Shorna, Saad-ur-Rahman Sarwar, Hasina Alam, Md. Ezharul Haque
article en

Abstract

Background: Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common anorectal disease affecting millions of people around the world and represents a major medical and socioeconomic problem, severely affecting patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to compare the early outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of second and third degree haemorrhoids. Methods: In this study, adult patients who presented to the general surgery outpatient clinics in BIRDEM General Hospital with symptomatic second and third degree hemorrhoid along with patients who agreed to continue follow[1] up for 6 weeks were included. This study was carried out from May 2023 to October 2024 after ethical clearance from Intitutional reiview board of BIRDEM General Hospital. Patients follow up was on the first post operative day, after 1 week and after 6 weeks. This was a quasi experimental study, sampling method was convenience sampling and patients were treated by either stapled haemorrhoidopexy (n=32) or open haemorrhoidectomy (n=32). The total sample size was 64. Data were collected by using a questionnaire for the study by researcher herself. Data processing and analysis were done using SPSS (statistical package for social sciences), version 26. Results: To evaluate the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) and open haemorrhoidectomy (OH), 64 patients were compared for age, comorbidities and results. The average operation duration for OH was much lower (27.6 ± 5.6 minutes) than for SH (34.0 ± 6.12 minutes). In the SH group, 96.9% (31 patients) had intraoperative bleeding under 30 ml, compared to 87.5% (28 patients) in the OH group, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.355). The SH group had significantly lower pain scores on the 1st and 7th postoperative days (3.97 ± 0.47) and (2.19 ± 0.78) compared to the OH group (4.84 ± 0.98 and 2.94 ± 0.87, respectively) (p=0.001). All OH patients needed sitz bath for more than 7 days, while only 6.3% of SH patients did (p=0.001). The SH group had no wound infections on the 7th postoperative day, compared to 12.5% in the OH group (p=0.162). The SH group had a shorter hospital stay (1.09 ± 0.2 days) than the OH group (1.23 ± 0.4 days), however the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.182). The SH group returned to normal activities significantly earlier (2.63 ± 0.8 days) than the OH group (4.28 ± 1.2 days) (p=0.001). SH patients were 37.5% satisfied and rated as excellent with their findings, compared to 9.4% of OH patients. Conclusion: Overall, stapled haemorrhoidopexy demonstrated advantages in terms of postoperative pain, recovery time, and patient satisfaction, whereas open haemorrhoidectomy showed shorter operative times. BIRDEM Med J 2025; 15(3): 103-110

BIRDEM Medical JournalVol. 15(3)
Bangladesh Medical University (BD), Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation for Diabetes Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BD), Bangladesh Bank (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.