Research on Risk Identification in Legal Due Diligence and Response Strategies in Cross border Mergers and Acquisitions Transactions

As global investment deepens, cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have become a primary avenue for enterprises to secure key resources, enter new markets, and realize strategic synergies.Yet divergent legal frameworks, review procedures, and policy priorities across jurisdictions have sharply heightened legitimacy risks.Drawing on U.S. law-particularly CFIUS practice-and international investment law, this article systematically examines challenges arising from disparate approval regimes, the tension between antitrust and national-security reviews, and the opacity of investor identities.It then analyzes CFIUS's risk-assessment logic, the constraining-but often limited-role of international investment agreements, and proposes concrete responses: rigorous, multidimensional due-diligence; transaction structures that anticipate or mitigate regulatory triggers; and more robust legal-opinion and compliance-assurance mechanisms.In an era of tightening global oversight and intensifying security-policy scrutiny, cross-border M&A must embed legal-compliance design at the core of deal planning and elevate legitimacy considerations to ensure both smooth execution and sustained post-closing compliance.

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Statistics Research
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38007/sesr.2025.060207
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Risk Identification in Legal Due Diligence and Response Strategies in Cross border Mergers and Acquisitions Transactions

Socio-Economic Statistics Research
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Research on Risk Identification in Legal Due Diligence and Response Strategies in Cross border Mergers and Acquisitions Transactions

article en

Abstract

As global investment deepens, cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have become a primary avenue for enterprises to secure key resources, enter new markets, and realize strategic synergies.Yet divergent legal frameworks, review procedures, and policy priorities across jurisdictions have sharply heightened legitimacy risks.Drawing on U.S. law-particularly CFIUS practice-and international investment law, this article systematically examines challenges arising from disparate approval regimes, the tension between antitrust and national-security reviews, and the opacity of investor identities.It then analyzes CFIUS's risk-assessment logic, the constraining-but often limited-role of international investment agreements, and proposes concrete responses: rigorous, multidimensional due-diligence; transaction structures that anticipate or mitigate regulatory triggers; and more robust legal-opinion and compliance-assurance mechanisms.In an era of tightening global oversight and intensifying security-policy scrutiny, cross-border M&A must embed legal-compliance design at the core of deal planning and elevate legitimacy considerations to ensure both smooth execution and sustained post-closing compliance.

Socio-Economic Statistics ResearchVol. 6(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.