Type S and M errors as a "rhetorical tool"
We recently posted a preprint criticizing the idea of Type S and M errors (https://osf.io/2phzb_v1). From our abstract: "While these concepts have been proposed to be useful both when designing a study (prospective) and when evaluating results (retroactive), we argue that these statistics do not facilitate the proper design of studies, nor the meaningful interpretation of results." In a recent blog post that is mainly on p-curve analysis, Gelman
Authors
- Daniel Lakens
Publication Details
- Journal
- Front Matter
- Published
- 2025-09-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.59350/g4c9v-60z48
- Primary Topic
- Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00