Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi‐Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient- and area-level factors in relation to telehealth visit use in cancer care. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: We surveyed a cohort of adults with an upcoming healthcare visit related to their cancer treatment at two academic medical centers (one in central North Carolina and one in southeast Michigan) and their community affiliates. Black adults and those with a scheduled telehealth visit were purposively oversampled during recruitment. We linked respondent residential addresses to area-level measures, including broadband access. The two patient-reported outcomes of interest were (1) whether a choice in visit type (virtual or in-person) was offered and (2) scheduled visit type. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We assembled a cohort of 773 adults (response rate = 15%). After excluding nonrecall for being offered a choice, the analytic sample was 725 adults. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The sample was 46% aged < 65 years, 42% Black, and 67% women. Black respondents were less likely than non-Black respondents to be offered a choice, 15% versus 23%, prevalence difference (PD) and 95% CI = (-8.7%, CI: -14.4, -3.0) and if offered a choice, less likely to accept a telehealth visit (20% vs. 67%; PD = -47.0%, CI: -62.0, -32.0). Compared to men, women had a lower frequency of visit choice (16% vs. 27%; PD = -10.9%. CI: -17.4, -4.4) and accepted telehealth visits (42% vs. 63%; PD = -20.8%, CI: -36.8, -4.7). Respondents who expressed technology-related worries were less likely to accept a telehealth visit. Lower area-level technology access (e.g., broadband ownership) and higher poverty were nonsignificantly associated with less offering and less scheduling of telehealth visits. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to improve access to telehealth in cancer care and mitigate structural inequities (namely racism and sexism) should consider patient- and area-level barriers to being offered a choice in visit type and the ability to accept a telehealth visit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/thfx-6y50
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi‐Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use

Christine M Neslund-Dudas, Samantha H. Tam, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Matthew R. Dunn et al.
UNC Libraries
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi‐Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use

Christine M Neslund-Dudas, Samantha H. Tam, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Matthew R. Dunn, Ilona Fridman, Alan C. Kinlaw
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient- and area-level factors in relation to telehealth visit use in cancer care. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: We surveyed a cohort of adults with an upcoming healthcare visit related to their cancer treatment at two academic medical centers (one in central North Carolina and one in southeast Michigan) and their community affiliates. Black adults and those with a scheduled telehealth visit were purposively oversampled during recruitment. We linked respondent residential addresses to area-level measures, including broadband access. The two patient-reported outcomes of interest were (1) whether a choice in visit type (virtual or in-person) was offered and (2) scheduled visit type. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We assembled a cohort of 773 adults (response rate = 15%). After excluding nonrecall for being offered a choice, the analytic sample was 725 adults. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The sample was 46% aged < 65 years, 42% Black, and 67% women. Black respondents were less likely than non-Black respondents to be offered a choice, 15% versus 23%, prevalence difference (PD) and 95% CI = (-8.7%, CI: -14.4, -3.0) and if offered a choice, less likely to accept a telehealth visit (20% vs. 67%; PD = -47.0%, CI: -62.0, -32.0). Compared to men, women had a lower frequency of visit choice (16% vs. 27%; PD = -10.9%. CI: -17.4, -4.4) and accepted telehealth visits (42% vs. 63%; PD = -20.8%, CI: -36.8, -4.7). Respondents who expressed technology-related worries were less likely to accept a telehealth visit. Lower area-level technology access (e.g., broadband ownership) and higher poverty were nonsignificantly associated with less offering and less scheduling of telehealth visits. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to improve access to telehealth in cancer care and mitigate structural inequities (namely racism and sexism) should consider patient- and area-level barriers to being offered a choice in visit type and the ability to accept a telehealth visit.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.