Institutionalizing Redundancy: Establishing a Saudi Arabian Military Reserve Component

Saudi Arabia maintains the third-largest standing military in the Middle East but ranks sixth when accounting for other nations’ reserve forces. This paper examines the numerical disparity and proposes a solution: establishing reserve components within the Saudi Arabian Armed Forces with both policy and conceptual implications. Despite limited public discourse on this issue, integrating reserves presents a strategic opportunity within Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Defense transformation plan. Using redundancy as a conceptual framework, the paper explores how reserve forces can enhance force structure and personnel management. The analysis provides a historical and contemporary overview of the Saudi armed forces and assesses the domestic debate on military recruitment, which has largely focused on compulsory conscription while overlooking reserves. It then evaluates two reserve models: Israel’s conscription-based “fighting nation” approach and the U.S.’s flexible, hybrid “citizen-warrior” model. This paper argues that Saudi Arabia would benefit most from the U.S. model, which emphasizes adaptability and interoperability. It highlights the advantages of reserve forces in enhancing civil–military integration, improving personnel retention, and strengthening capabilities in logistics, medical support, and other specialties. Additionally, the paper addresses key challenges, including civil-military cultural divides, personnel costs, and regional security dynamics with Iran. Using the DoD Comptroller’s 2024 Green Book as a benchmark for U.S. defense spending, the paper estimates that Saudi Arabia could initially allocate approximately $3 billion annually (6% of its 2022 defense budget) to establish Reserve Components at 60% of active personnel levels, mirroring the U.S. ratio. While this estimate has limitations, it offers insight into potential funding requirements for different reserve force structures. The paper concludes that although forming reserve forces may initially increase costs and military size, their long-term benefits in strategic flexibility and resilience would outweigh these concerns. If implemented effectively, this approach would provide an optimal alternative to widespread conscription.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251377874
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutionalizing Redundancy: Establishing a Saudi Arabian Military Reserve Component

Faris Almaari
Alternatives Global Local Political
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

Institutionalizing Redundancy: Establishing a Saudi Arabian Military Reserve Component

Faris Almaari
article en

Abstract

Saudi Arabia maintains the third-largest standing military in the Middle East but ranks sixth when accounting for other nations’ reserve forces. This paper examines the numerical disparity and proposes a solution: establishing reserve components within the Saudi Arabian Armed Forces with both policy and conceptual implications. Despite limited public discourse on this issue, integrating reserves presents a strategic opportunity within Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Defense transformation plan. Using redundancy as a conceptual framework, the paper explores how reserve forces can enhance force structure and personnel management. The analysis provides a historical and contemporary overview of the Saudi armed forces and assesses the domestic debate on military recruitment, which has largely focused on compulsory conscription while overlooking reserves. It then evaluates two reserve models: Israel’s conscription-based “fighting nation” approach and the U.S.’s flexible, hybrid “citizen-warrior” model. This paper argues that Saudi Arabia would benefit most from the U.S. model, which emphasizes adaptability and interoperability. It highlights the advantages of reserve forces in enhancing civil–military integration, improving personnel retention, and strengthening capabilities in logistics, medical support, and other specialties. Additionally, the paper addresses key challenges, including civil-military cultural divides, personnel costs, and regional security dynamics with Iran. Using the DoD Comptroller’s 2024 Green Book as a benchmark for U.S. defense spending, the paper estimates that Saudi Arabia could initially allocate approximately $3 billion annually (6% of its 2022 defense budget) to establish Reserve Components at 60% of active personnel levels, mirroring the U.S. ratio. While this estimate has limitations, it offers insight into potential funding requirements for different reserve force structures. The paper concludes that although forming reserve forces may initially increase costs and military size, their long-term benefits in strategic flexibility and resilience would outweigh these concerns. If implemented effectively, this approach would provide an optimal alternative to widespread conscription.

Alternatives Global Local Political
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutionalizing Redundancy: Establishing a Saudi Arabian Military Reserve Component — Faris Almaari · Alternatives Global Local Political (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS