Why do Russian Universities Need Student Evaluation of Teaching?

Article analyzes the use of student evaluation of teaching (SET) in Russian universities – one of the key feedback tools in higher education. The authors examined documents from 694 universities to identify the presence of SET, its goals, and implementation features. The results show that only 13% of universities conduct SET targeting specific instructors. In most cases, SET serves summative purposes – supporting personnel decisions (36 universities), while formative use – for professional development – is found in just 16 universities. In 35 cases, the goals of SET could not be identified. The study also classifies SET questionnaires and explores the relationship between their structure and stated objectives. The authors conclude that in Russia, SET is often formal and rarely functions as an effective quality assurance mechanism. Possible reasons include institutional isomorphism, emphasis on external control, and insufficient attention to student feedback as a development resource. The paper raises the issue of rethinking the role of SET in Russian university governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-8-9-74-92
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do Russian Universities Need Student Evaluation of Teaching?

K. O. Tishkina, Nadezhda Knyaginina, Evgenii Puchkov
2 citations
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
17.85
article

Why do Russian Universities Need Student Evaluation of Teaching?

K. O. Tishkina, Nadezhda Knyaginina, Evgenii Puchkov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Article analyzes the use of student evaluation of teaching (SET) in Russian universities – one of the key feedback tools in higher education. The authors examined documents from 694 universities to identify the presence of SET, its goals, and implementation features. The results show that only 13% of universities conduct SET targeting specific instructors. In most cases, SET serves summative purposes – supporting personnel decisions (36 universities), while formative use – for professional development – is found in just 16 universities. In 35 cases, the goals of SET could not be identified. The study also classifies SET questionnaires and explores the relationship between their structure and stated objectives. The authors conclude that in Russia, SET is often formal and rarely functions as an effective quality assurance mechanism. Possible reasons include institutional isomorphism, emphasis on external control, and insufficient attention to student feedback as a development resource. The paper raises the issue of rethinking the role of SET in Russian university governance.

Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in RussiaVol. 34(8-9)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.