Influence of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment on Intraplate Stress and Seismicity in Eastern North America in the Presence of Pre‐Existing Weak Zones

Abstract Eastern North America has hosted significant historical earthquakes, where seismicity clusters along tectonically inherited structures. Using the spherical finite‐element code CitcomSVE and fully 3D viscosity structure, we model the intraplate stress response to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) using ICE‐6G, both with and without low‐viscosity intraplate weak zones. We find that present‐day GIA‐induced stresses are generally small ( MPa across most of eastern North America), both at present day and during deglaciation, and can locally reach 3–4 MPa where weak zones are present. Associated rotations are limited to 1°, which are insignificant relative to the spread of observed stress data and far smaller than the continental‐wide clockwise rotations obtained from mantle‐flow models. However, GIA can still locally modify fault stability. In the New Madrid Seismic Zone, GIA promotes stability on the Reelfoot thrust fault while making NE‐SW strike‐slip faults less stable, suggesting a role in modulating present‐day seismicity patterns but not in triggering the 1811–1812 sequence. In the Western Quebec Seismic Zone, GIA increases Coulomb failure stress (CFS) on the Timiskaming Fault and nearby faults, but changes in CFS in the Charlevoix Seismic Zone are negligible at present day and only marginally higher during deglaciation. Overall, GIA perturbs CFS by only a few MPa, insufficient to independently drive fault failure under tectonic background stress (TBS) conditions derived from mantle flow models, which dominate regional‐to‐continental intraplate stress. However, alternate lithospheric viscosity structures and TBS states can greatly enhance GIA stresses and their impact on faulting in the crust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gc012290
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment on Intraplate Stress and Seismicity in Eastern North America in the Presence of Pre‐Existing Weak Zones

Michael Gurnis, Erin Hightower
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Influence of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment on Intraplate Stress and Seismicity in Eastern North America in the Presence of Pre‐Existing Weak Zones

Michael Gurnis, Erin Hightower
article en

Abstract

Abstract Eastern North America has hosted significant historical earthquakes, where seismicity clusters along tectonically inherited structures. Using the spherical finite‐element code CitcomSVE and fully 3D viscosity structure, we model the intraplate stress response to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) using ICE‐6G, both with and without low‐viscosity intraplate weak zones. We find that present‐day GIA‐induced stresses are generally small ( MPa across most of eastern North America), both at present day and during deglaciation, and can locally reach 3–4 MPa where weak zones are present. Associated rotations are limited to 1°, which are insignificant relative to the spread of observed stress data and far smaller than the continental‐wide clockwise rotations obtained from mantle‐flow models. However, GIA can still locally modify fault stability. In the New Madrid Seismic Zone, GIA promotes stability on the Reelfoot thrust fault while making NE‐SW strike‐slip faults less stable, suggesting a role in modulating present‐day seismicity patterns but not in triggering the 1811–1812 sequence. In the Western Quebec Seismic Zone, GIA increases Coulomb failure stress (CFS) on the Timiskaming Fault and nearby faults, but changes in CFS in the Charlevoix Seismic Zone are negligible at present day and only marginally higher during deglaciation. Overall, GIA perturbs CFS by only a few MPa, insufficient to independently drive fault failure under tectonic background stress (TBS) conditions derived from mantle flow models, which dominate regional‐to‐continental intraplate stress. However, alternate lithospheric viscosity structures and TBS states can greatly enhance GIA stresses and their impact on faulting in the crust.

Geochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsVol. 26(10)
California Institute of Technology (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Influence of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment on Intraplate Stress and Seismicity in Eastern North America in the Presence of Pre‐Existing Weak Zones — Michael Gurnis, Erin Hightower · Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS