Personal Liability in Administrative Action: Rethinking Accountability in the Age of E-Governance

The question of personal liability in administrative law lies at the intersection of public duty and private accountability. While Indian jurisprudence has progressively recognised State liability through constitutional torts, accountability of individual officials remains fragmented and inconsistent. This paper examines the doctrinal foundations of administrative liability in India, analysing how courts have balanced sovereign immunity with the need for redress in cases of mala fide action, gross negligence, and custodial excesses. It highlights emerging contexts, digital governance, pandemic mismanagement, and human rights violations that underscore the urgency of moving beyond institutional liability. Comparative perspectives from the UK, US, and EU illustrate contrasting approaches to official responsibility. The paper argues for a calibrated Indian framework that indemnifies bona fide action while imposing personal liability for abuse of power, thereby fostering both effective governance and citizens’ trust in administration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56337
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal Liability in Administrative Action: Rethinking Accountability in the Age of E-Governance

Azariah Babu
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Personal Liability in Administrative Action: Rethinking Accountability in the Age of E-Governance

Azariah Babu
article en

Abstract

The question of personal liability in administrative law lies at the intersection of public duty and private accountability. While Indian jurisprudence has progressively recognised State liability through constitutional torts, accountability of individual officials remains fragmented and inconsistent. This paper examines the doctrinal foundations of administrative liability in India, analysing how courts have balanced sovereign immunity with the need for redress in cases of mala fide action, gross negligence, and custodial excesses. It highlights emerging contexts, digital governance, pandemic mismanagement, and human rights violations that underscore the urgency of moving beyond institutional liability. Comparative perspectives from the UK, US, and EU illustrate contrasting approaches to official responsibility. The paper argues for a calibrated Indian framework that indemnifies bona fide action while imposing personal liability for abuse of power, thereby fostering both effective governance and citizens’ trust in administration.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Personal Liability in Administrative Action: Rethinking Accountability in the Age of E-Governance — Azariah Babu · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS