An in-depth analysis of commercial, shock, and acoustic-extra-freezing techniques in fruit preservation

The development of innovative freezing technologies is becoming increasingly important in the food sector to ensure product quality while minimizing nutrient loss and structural degradation. Conventional methods like commercial and shock freezing have known limitations, particularly regarding cell integrity and sensory characteristics. In response, new approaches such as Acoustic Extra Freezing (AEF)—a commercial device that uses “acoustic” elastic waves to influence the crystallization process—are being explored as potential alternatives. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the novel AEF technology on the preservation quality of plant-based products, specifically blueberries and grapes. The core objective is to compare AEF with conventional commercial freezing and industrial shock freezing in terms of texture, color, and sensory performance—both after freezing and subsequent thawing. Blueberries and grapes were subjected to three freezing techniques: standard commercial freezing, shock freezing, and AEF (Acoustic Extra Freezing). Thawing was conducted using three methods: traditional refrigeration, water bath thawing, and the integrated thawing function of the AEF device. Sensory analyses, texture measurements, and microscopic evaluations were conducted to assess cell integrity and visual appearance post-treatment. Fresh fruit samples clearly exhibited superior quality across all parameters (texture, color, and sensory). Among frozen variants, shock freezing preserved sensory and structural properties best. The AEF method, despite its theoretical advantage of producing more uniform ice crystals, did not outperform conventional techniques. In fact, fruits treated with AEF showed more pronounced structural degradation and color migration in the microscopic analysis. Sensory evaluation also revealed off-flavors and texture softening in AEF-treated samples, particularly after thawing with the same system. While the AEF technology represents an innovative approach to acoustic-assisted freezing, the current findings suggest that it requires substantial optimization before practical application. The discrepancy between theoretical expectations (e.g., finer ice crystal formation) and experimental outcomes highlights the need for systematic refinement of process parameters. Future studies should focus on optimizing energy input, pulse modulation, and thawing protocols to unlock the full potential of this promising non-thermal preservation technique for high-quality fruit products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NFS Journal
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2025.100247
Primary Topic
Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An in-depth analysis of commercial, shock, and acoustic-extra-freezing techniques in fruit preservation

Fabien Schultz, Katherine G. Oldenburg, Leif‐Alexander Garbe, Michael Nelles
NFS Journal
Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
article

An in-depth analysis of commercial, shock, and acoustic-extra-freezing techniques in fruit preservation

Fabien Schultz, Katherine G. Oldenburg, Leif‐Alexander Garbe, Michael Nelles
article en

Abstract

The development of innovative freezing technologies is becoming increasingly important in the food sector to ensure product quality while minimizing nutrient loss and structural degradation. Conventional methods like commercial and shock freezing have known limitations, particularly regarding cell integrity and sensory characteristics. In response, new approaches such as Acoustic Extra Freezing (AEF)—a commercial device that uses “acoustic” elastic waves to influence the crystallization process—are being explored as potential alternatives. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the novel AEF technology on the preservation quality of plant-based products, specifically blueberries and grapes. The core objective is to compare AEF with conventional commercial freezing and industrial shock freezing in terms of texture, color, and sensory performance—both after freezing and subsequent thawing. Blueberries and grapes were subjected to three freezing techniques: standard commercial freezing, shock freezing, and AEF (Acoustic Extra Freezing). Thawing was conducted using three methods: traditional refrigeration, water bath thawing, and the integrated thawing function of the AEF device. Sensory analyses, texture measurements, and microscopic evaluations were conducted to assess cell integrity and visual appearance post-treatment. Fresh fruit samples clearly exhibited superior quality across all parameters (texture, color, and sensory). Among frozen variants, shock freezing preserved sensory and structural properties best. The AEF method, despite its theoretical advantage of producing more uniform ice crystals, did not outperform conventional techniques. In fact, fruits treated with AEF showed more pronounced structural degradation and color migration in the microscopic analysis. Sensory evaluation also revealed off-flavors and texture softening in AEF-treated samples, particularly after thawing with the same system. While the AEF technology represents an innovative approach to acoustic-assisted freezing, the current findings suggest that it requires substantial optimization before practical application. The discrepancy between theoretical expectations (e.g., finer ice crystal formation) and experimental outcomes highlights the need for systematic refinement of process parameters. Future studies should focus on optimizing energy input, pulse modulation, and thawing protocols to unlock the full potential of this promising non-thermal preservation technique for high-quality fruit products.

NFS JournalVol. 41
Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DE), Geothermie Neubrandenburg (Germany) (DE), Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Rostock (DE), Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.