Rethinking adaptation interventions in agricultural systems for sustainability

Global policy frameworks have accelerated investments in agricultural adaptation interventions. However, prevailing approaches often conflate adoption intensity with success, overlooking the complex behavioral, structural, and temporal dynamics that shape who can sustain adoptions over time. We synthesize empirical evidence to argue that a narrow focus on adoption in adaptation intervention programs risks exacerbating inequalities in agricultural systems. Many such programs view adoption as a one-time decision, disproportionately target resource-rich farmers, and overlook the dynamic, long-term conditions essential for sustained adoption. Sustained use of adaptation strategies, however, requires distinct capacities, and when farmers discontinue these strategies, they can become entrenched in poverty traps, leading to widening wealth inequalities between sustained adopters and dropouts. Marginalized farmers are particularly vulnerable to these outcomes, which contradict the equity goals of policy frameworks. This review emphasizes the need to re-evaluate adaptation intervention programs in agricultural systems to better address the long-term needs of marginalized communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101571
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking adaptation interventions in agricultural systems for sustainability

Nathan J. Cook, Donald R. Nelson, Sechindra Vallury
1 citations
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
article

Rethinking adaptation interventions in agricultural systems for sustainability

Nathan J. Cook, Donald R. Nelson, Sechindra Vallury
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Global policy frameworks have accelerated investments in agricultural adaptation interventions. However, prevailing approaches often conflate adoption intensity with success, overlooking the complex behavioral, structural, and temporal dynamics that shape who can sustain adoptions over time. We synthesize empirical evidence to argue that a narrow focus on adoption in adaptation intervention programs risks exacerbating inequalities in agricultural systems. Many such programs view adoption as a one-time decision, disproportionately target resource-rich farmers, and overlook the dynamic, long-term conditions essential for sustained adoption. Sustained use of adaptation strategies, however, requires distinct capacities, and when farmers discontinue these strategies, they can become entrenched in poverty traps, leading to widening wealth inequalities between sustained adopters and dropouts. Marginalized farmers are particularly vulnerable to these outcomes, which contradict the equity goals of policy frameworks. This review emphasizes the need to re-evaluate adaptation intervention programs in agricultural systems to better address the long-term needs of marginalized communities.

Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 77
University of Georgia (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Franklin College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.