Common misinterpretations of statistical significance and P-values in dairy research

Careful communication of results is integral to dairy research. However, many published studies contain misinterpretation of the results of statistical analysis, which can lead to conclusions being drawn which are not consistent with the data. Many of these interpretations have arisen because of a focus on <i>P-</i>values rather than on the potential range of effects that are compatible with the study data. This review focuses on 3 misinterpretations: the use of levels of statistical significance to compare results between or within studies, overinterpretation of nonsignificant results, and the use of "trend" to describe results that are "close" to a significance threshold. All of these misinterpretations can be avoided by paying more attention to the range of effects that are compatible with the data. Such a focus will have many benefits-not least, making it clearer when studies have insufficient power to accurately characterize their outcomes. Focusing on compatible effects is not a panacea but will improve statistical inference and provide more thoughtful descriptions of study outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2025-0835
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common misinterpretations of statistical significance and P-values in dairy research

Richard Laven, Danchen Aaron Yang
3 citations
JDS Communications
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
article

Common misinterpretations of statistical significance and P-values in dairy research

Richard Laven, Danchen Aaron Yang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Careful communication of results is integral to dairy research. However, many published studies contain misinterpretation of the results of statistical analysis, which can lead to conclusions being drawn which are not consistent with the data. Many of these interpretations have arisen because of a focus on <i>P-</i>values rather than on the potential range of effects that are compatible with the study data. This review focuses on 3 misinterpretations: the use of levels of statistical significance to compare results between or within studies, overinterpretation of nonsignificant results, and the use of "trend" to describe results that are "close" to a significance threshold. All of these misinterpretations can be avoided by paying more attention to the range of effects that are compatible with the data. Such a focus will have many benefits-not least, making it clearer when studies have insufficient power to accurately characterize their outcomes. Focusing on compatible effects is not a panacea but will improve statistical inference and provide more thoughtful descriptions of study outcomes.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 6(6)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Massey University (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.