Urban tree planning: Can MCDA-driven approaches help improve current practices? A Canadian case study

Canadian cities are striving to address climate change by setting ambitious goals for tree planting and increasing urban canopy cover. However, urban tree planning is complex, involving multiple objectives like reducing heat islands, improving public health, and minimizing costs, while balancing the interests of various stakeholders. To manage this complexity, a spatial suitability model for tree planting was developed using GIS-MCDA. This model was co-created with stakeholders in Montreal, Canada, and aims to improve upon traditional urban tree planning methods by combining territorial opportunities and needs. A comparison was made between the model's recommendations for tree planting sites and the sites previously planned by municipal institutions in three Montreal boroughs. The analysis, which considered both the entire study area, and a subset comprised of public land, showed a significant discrepancy between the areas prioritized by the model and those selected by the boroughs, with little overlap between the two. This difference may stem from the model's broaderscale approach, while the boroughs focused on individual tree pits at a finer scale. Despite these differences, the framework provides an opportunity for municipal institutions to consider a wider range of planting sites and take into account a more complete set of decision criteria. By using this model, cities can optimize tree planting efforts to provide needed ecosystem services to the local populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trees Forests and People
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101029
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban tree planning: Can MCDA-driven approaches help improve current practices? A Canadian case study

Martijn Kuller, Françoise Bichai, Danielle Dagenais, Alexandre Rioux et al.
Trees Forests and People
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Urban tree planning: Can MCDA-driven approaches help improve current practices? A Canadian case study

Martijn Kuller, Françoise Bichai, Danielle Dagenais, Alexandre Rioux, S. Lacroix
article en

Abstract

Canadian cities are striving to address climate change by setting ambitious goals for tree planting and increasing urban canopy cover. However, urban tree planning is complex, involving multiple objectives like reducing heat islands, improving public health, and minimizing costs, while balancing the interests of various stakeholders. To manage this complexity, a spatial suitability model for tree planting was developed using GIS-MCDA. This model was co-created with stakeholders in Montreal, Canada, and aims to improve upon traditional urban tree planning methods by combining territorial opportunities and needs. A comparison was made between the model's recommendations for tree planting sites and the sites previously planned by municipal institutions in three Montreal boroughs. The analysis, which considered both the entire study area, and a subset comprised of public land, showed a significant discrepancy between the areas prioritized by the model and those selected by the boroughs, with little overlap between the two. This difference may stem from the model's broaderscale approach, while the boroughs focused on individual tree pits at a finer scale. Despite these differences, the framework provides an opportunity for municipal institutions to consider a wider range of planting sites and take into account a more complete set of decision criteria. By using this model, cities can optimize tree planting efforts to provide needed ecosystem services to the local populations.

Trees Forests and PeopleVol. 22
HEC Montréal (CA), Utrecht University (NL), Polytechnique Montréal (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.