The shifting role of nature and the landscape in psychiatric Institutions: A case study from Germany in a historical perspective

Nature has been pivotal in psychiatric care since the establishment of asylums, but its role within psychiatric institutions over time, including landscape design, utilisation, and therapeutic impact, has received limited attention. This study addresses this gap through a case study of a psychiatric clinic in Gütersloh, Germany. Drawing on scientific literature, historical analyses, and archival material, we trace the transformation of the clinic's landscape from its planning in 1904 to the present day. We examine its relationship with treatment paradigms, socio-political influences, and evolving theories of environmental mental health. The analysis identifies five overlapping phases in the development: (1) Nature as Therapy , when rural locations and gardens were viewed as inherently therapeutic; (2) Work in Nature , a shift to agricultural work therapy which, under National Socialism, became distorted into forced labour; (3) Therapy Indoors , a post-war transition toward occupational and group therapies; (4) Therapy in the Individual Body , reflecting the rise of pharmacology and psychotherapy that shifted the locus of therapy and control to the patient's body; and (5) Therapy in the Community , outpatient care expanded in the decades following the “Psychiatry Enquête”. Despite these shifts, research on current patient feedback highlights the continued value of greenspaces, aligning with the growing evidence of health-promoting effects of nature. By synthesising historical insights with current evidence, this research contributes to interdisciplinary understanding and provides insights for nature's integration into future psychiatric care. Participatory approaches and multifunctionality are essential to address the varied needs of psychiatric patients and maximise nature's therapeutic potential. • Throughout the past century, there have been considerable shifts in the role of the landscape within psychiatric institutions. We identified 5 phases in the relationship between landscapes and psychiatric care. • Historical shifts in landscape roles mirror broader socio-political and therapeutic changes and exemplify the contested meaning. • Since the second half of the 20th century, landscapes have diminished in significance as therapeutic settings in Germany. • The Gütersloh clinic is an exemplar of the ongoing therapeutic value and sanctuary offered by a park landscape. • Contemporary psychiatric greenspaces retain the potential to promote well-being and healing for patients, as well as a subversive potential for freedom within the institution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100644
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The shifting role of nature and the landscape in psychiatric Institutions: A case study from Germany in a historical perspective

Hannah‐Lea Schmid, Stefan Zerbe, Michel Rinderhagen, Christine Norra et al.
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Urban Green Space and Health
article

The shifting role of nature and the landscape in psychiatric Institutions: A case study from Germany in a historical perspective

Hannah‐Lea Schmid, Stefan Zerbe, Michel Rinderhagen, Christine Norra, Claudia Hornberg, Timothy McCall, Klaus-Thomas Kronmüller
article en

Abstract

Nature has been pivotal in psychiatric care since the establishment of asylums, but its role within psychiatric institutions over time, including landscape design, utilisation, and therapeutic impact, has received limited attention. This study addresses this gap through a case study of a psychiatric clinic in Gütersloh, Germany. Drawing on scientific literature, historical analyses, and archival material, we trace the transformation of the clinic's landscape from its planning in 1904 to the present day. We examine its relationship with treatment paradigms, socio-political influences, and evolving theories of environmental mental health. The analysis identifies five overlapping phases in the development: (1) Nature as Therapy , when rural locations and gardens were viewed as inherently therapeutic; (2) Work in Nature , a shift to agricultural work therapy which, under National Socialism, became distorted into forced labour; (3) Therapy Indoors , a post-war transition toward occupational and group therapies; (4) Therapy in the Individual Body , reflecting the rise of pharmacology and psychotherapy that shifted the locus of therapy and control to the patient's body; and (5) Therapy in the Community , outpatient care expanded in the decades following the “Psychiatry Enquête”. Despite these shifts, research on current patient feedback highlights the continued value of greenspaces, aligning with the growing evidence of health-promoting effects of nature. By synthesising historical insights with current evidence, this research contributes to interdisciplinary understanding and provides insights for nature's integration into future psychiatric care. Participatory approaches and multifunctionality are essential to address the varied needs of psychiatric patients and maximise nature's therapeutic potential. • Throughout the past century, there have been considerable shifts in the role of the landscape within psychiatric institutions. We identified 5 phases in the relationship between landscapes and psychiatric care. • Historical shifts in landscape roles mirror broader socio-political and therapeutic changes and exemplify the contested meaning. • Since the second half of the 20th century, landscapes have diminished in significance as therapeutic settings in Germany. • The Gütersloh clinic is an exemplar of the ongoing therapeutic value and sanctuary offered by a park landscape. • Contemporary psychiatric greenspaces retain the potential to promote well-being and healing for patients, as well as a subversive potential for freedom within the institution.

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 8
University of Hildesheim (DE), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Bielefeld University (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), Klinik für Psychosomatik (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.