A multidimensional assessment of electrification in automotive powertrains: Technical, operational, and strategic perspectives

Global transportation is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the convergence of decarbonization targets and advances in electrification technologies. Electrification, ranging from mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles (mHEVs) to Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), represents the main technological path in the transition from internal combustion engines. This transition is inherently multidimensional, simultaneously reshaping vehicle design, manufacturing systems, supply chains, customer value, and environmental outcomes in interconnected ways. Each architecture, including mHEV, Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV), and BEV, presents different tradeoffs in these dimensions, requiring a structured framework for systematic comparison. To address this gap, this work details an integrated framework that systematically compares electrification pathways across five interrelated dimensions: vehicle concepts, research and development, manufacturing and logistics, customer experience, and environmental footprint. This framework culminates in a decision matrix that consolidates trade-offs into a practical SWOT based tool for strategic planning. • A novel multi-dimensional framework is proposed to evaluate vehicle types (ICEV, mHEV, HEV, PHEV, BEV) across five key domains: concept architecture, R&D complexity, manufacturing and logistics, environmental footprint, and customer experience. • Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) represent a technological bridge, combining mature ICE systems with electrified components, balancing performance, cost, and regulatory demands. • Manufacturing and supply chain analysis reveals that while ICEV remains the most optimized, BEVs and PHEVs introduce logistical and safety complexities due to battery size, voltage, and specialized handling. • Environmental impact comparison challenges conventional narratives: under certain energy matrices, ICEVs powered by biofuels can be more sustainable than BEVs charged by fossil-based grids. • The framework supports strategic decision-making for OEMs and policymakers, providing a view of trade-offs and transition dynamics in vehicle electrification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107377
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multidimensional assessment of electrification in automotive powertrains: Technical, operational, and strategic perspectives

Carlos Antônio Rufino Júnior, João Marcos Kanieski, Hudson Zanin, Hans‐Georg Schweiger et al.
2 citations
Results in Engineering
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
article

A multidimensional assessment of electrification in automotive powertrains: Technical, operational, and strategic perspectives

Carlos Antônio Rufino Júnior, João Marcos Kanieski, Hudson Zanin, Hans‐Georg Schweiger, Celise Villa dos Santos, Milad Kalume Neto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Global transportation is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the convergence of decarbonization targets and advances in electrification technologies. Electrification, ranging from mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles (mHEVs) to Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), represents the main technological path in the transition from internal combustion engines. This transition is inherently multidimensional, simultaneously reshaping vehicle design, manufacturing systems, supply chains, customer value, and environmental outcomes in interconnected ways. Each architecture, including mHEV, Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV), and BEV, presents different tradeoffs in these dimensions, requiring a structured framework for systematic comparison. To address this gap, this work details an integrated framework that systematically compares electrification pathways across five interrelated dimensions: vehicle concepts, research and development, manufacturing and logistics, customer experience, and environmental footprint. This framework culminates in a decision matrix that consolidates trade-offs into a practical SWOT based tool for strategic planning. • A novel multi-dimensional framework is proposed to evaluate vehicle types (ICEV, mHEV, HEV, PHEV, BEV) across five key domains: concept architecture, R&D complexity, manufacturing and logistics, environmental footprint, and customer experience. • Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) represent a technological bridge, combining mature ICE systems with electrified components, balancing performance, cost, and regulatory demands. • Manufacturing and supply chain analysis reveals that while ICEV remains the most optimized, BEVs and PHEVs introduce logistical and safety complexities due to battery size, voltage, and specialized handling. • Environmental impact comparison challenges conventional narratives: under certain energy matrices, ICEVs powered by biofuels can be more sustainable than BEVs charged by fossil-based grids. • The framework supports strategic decision-making for OEMs and policymakers, providing a view of trade-offs and transition dynamics in vehicle electrification.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.