Artificial intelligence in classroom management: A systematic review on educational purposes, technical implementations, and ethical considerations

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping education, including classroom management. This systematic review analyzes 104 studies (2000–2022) on the use of AI in classroom management, focusing on educational purposes, technical implementations, and ethical considerations. Our findings show a growing use of AI technologies—particularly machine learning and deep learning—for tasks such as attendance tracking, behavior monitoring, and engagement assessment. These tools can streamline classroom management and offer detailed insights into student behavior. However, only a minority of studies leveraged AI’s full potential, such as real-time feedback or multimodal data. Ethical issues, particularly privacy, data security, and algorithmic bias, were often underreported: only 22% of studies addressed ethical concerns, and just 13% implemented privacy-preserving measures. Our review underscores the importance of balancing technological innovation with ethical responsibility. It offers a comprehensive overview of AI’s current applications and highlights future challenges and directions for responsible AI use in classrooms. • Systematic review of 104 AI classroom studies on goals, methods, and ethics. • Most tools focus on student attention, behavior, or engagement tracking. • Only 16% of studies used AI beyond efficiency, e.g., real-time feedback. • Ethical concerns were addressed in just 22% of reviewed studies. • 49% of models used video data directly without explicit feature design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100483
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in classroom management: A systematic review on educational purposes, technical implementations, and ethical considerations

Enkelejda Kasneci, Patricia Goldberg, Vlasta Sikimić, Kathleen Stürmer et al.
4 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Online Learning and Analytics
6.77
article

Artificial intelligence in classroom management: A systematic review on educational purposes, technical implementations, and ethical considerations

Enkelejda Kasneci, Patricia Goldberg, Vlasta Sikimić, Kathleen Stürmer, Tim Fütterer, Babette Bühler, Ulrich Trautwein, Peter Gerjets
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping education, including classroom management. This systematic review analyzes 104 studies (2000–2022) on the use of AI in classroom management, focusing on educational purposes, technical implementations, and ethical considerations. Our findings show a growing use of AI technologies—particularly machine learning and deep learning—for tasks such as attendance tracking, behavior monitoring, and engagement assessment. These tools can streamline classroom management and offer detailed insights into student behavior. However, only a minority of studies leveraged AI’s full potential, such as real-time feedback or multimodal data. Ethical issues, particularly privacy, data security, and algorithmic bias, were often underreported: only 22% of studies addressed ethical concerns, and just 13% implemented privacy-preserving measures. Our review underscores the importance of balancing technological innovation with ethical responsibility. It offers a comprehensive overview of AI’s current applications and highlights future challenges and directions for responsible AI use in classrooms. • Systematic review of 104 AI classroom studies on goals, methods, and ethics. • Most tools focus on student attention, behavior, or engagement tracking. • Only 16% of studies used AI beyond efficiency, e.g., real-time feedback. • Ethical concerns were addressed in just 22% of reviewed studies. • 49% of models used video data directly without explicit feature design.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9
Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Online Learning and Analytics
6.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.