INVESTIGATING GENDER GAP IN METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGY: UNEARTHING PRACTICAL CHALLENGES IN ONLINE EFL READING

Despite the growing use of online reading in higher education, particularly among EFL learners, limited study has examined how students differ in their use of reading strategies and the specific challenges they face in online context. Most studies address online reading in general terms, but few examine gender-based perceptions and strategic behaviors in online environments. This study aims to fill the gap by examining the application of metacognitive strategies in online reading focusing on gender differences and the challenges students encounter. A mixed method was employed, involving 100 undergraduate students from non-English departments. Data were gathered using the Online Reading Strategies Inventory (ORSI) and open-ended questionnaires. Findings revealed that both male and female students reported moderate use of metacognitive strategies, with no significant difference in overall strategy selection. However, a gender-related gap was observed in the utilization of support strategies. Additionally, students identified several challenges, including limited engagement with digital features, low literacy skills, and a lack of effective strategy use. The results offer substantial pedagogical implications for English language teaching, emphasizing the need to address students’ difficulties in online reading and to train them in diverse metacognitive strategies to strengthen their reading comprehension, particularly in online contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiralodra English Journal
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v9i2.476
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Media Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INVESTIGATING GENDER GAP IN METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGY: UNEARTHING PRACTICAL CHALLENGES IN ONLINE EFL READING

Radina Anggun Nurisma, Yazid Basthomi
Wiralodra English Journal
Educational Methods and Media Use
article

INVESTIGATING GENDER GAP IN METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGY: UNEARTHING PRACTICAL CHALLENGES IN ONLINE EFL READING

Radina Anggun Nurisma, Yazid Basthomi
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing use of online reading in higher education, particularly among EFL learners, limited study has examined how students differ in their use of reading strategies and the specific challenges they face in online context. Most studies address online reading in general terms, but few examine gender-based perceptions and strategic behaviors in online environments. This study aims to fill the gap by examining the application of metacognitive strategies in online reading focusing on gender differences and the challenges students encounter. A mixed method was employed, involving 100 undergraduate students from non-English departments. Data were gathered using the Online Reading Strategies Inventory (ORSI) and open-ended questionnaires. Findings revealed that both male and female students reported moderate use of metacognitive strategies, with no significant difference in overall strategy selection. However, a gender-related gap was observed in the utilization of support strategies. Additionally, students identified several challenges, including limited engagement with digital features, low literacy skills, and a lack of effective strategy use. The results offer substantial pedagogical implications for English language teaching, emphasizing the need to address students’ difficulties in online reading and to train them in diverse metacognitive strategies to strengthen their reading comprehension, particularly in online contexts.

Wiralodra English JournalVol. 9(2)
State University of Malang (ID), Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Educational Methods and Media Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.