Does independent regulation of MPs’ pay and expenses improve political trust? Evidence from a survey experiment

The UK Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) was the world’s first fully independent regulator of MPs’ remuneration, set up in 2009 to restore standards and rebuild trust. However, more than 15 years later there is low awareness of its role and political trust continues to decline. This paper uses original data from two pre-registered survey experiments ( n = 1957) to test whether informing citizens of the existence of IPSA, or framing pay and expenses figures with contextual information, could improve perceptions that remuneration is fair and increase trust in the government and politicians. Making MPs’ remuneration more salient is found to have a negative effect on trust – especially when expenses are mentioned – but highlighting the role of the regulator and alternative framing may mitigate this to some extent. The findings have significant implications for policymakers as they suggest public engagement on fair remuneration may be counterproductive in relation to trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251370195
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does independent regulation of MPs’ pay and expenses improve political trust? Evidence from a survey experiment

Helen A Bramah
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Does independent regulation of MPs’ pay and expenses improve political trust? Evidence from a survey experiment

Helen A Bramah
article en

Abstract

The UK Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) was the world’s first fully independent regulator of MPs’ remuneration, set up in 2009 to restore standards and rebuild trust. However, more than 15 years later there is low awareness of its role and political trust continues to decline. This paper uses original data from two pre-registered survey experiments ( n = 1957) to test whether informing citizens of the existence of IPSA, or framing pay and expenses figures with contextual information, could improve perceptions that remuneration is fair and increase trust in the government and politicians. Making MPs’ remuneration more salient is found to have a negative effect on trust – especially when expenses are mentioned – but highlighting the role of the regulator and alternative framing may mitigate this to some extent. The findings have significant implications for policymakers as they suggest public engagement on fair remuneration may be counterproductive in relation to trust.

The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.