How multisensory nature exposure affects well‐being: Visual and auditory influences on affect

Abstract Human landscapes are increasingly diverse, and natural and urban features can coexist in one setting. Though the positive effects of nature exposure on human well‐being indices are well known, we understand less about how mixed environments, with their associated multisensory dimensions, influence well‐being. To explore this gap, we investigated the effects of visual and auditory nature exposure, and their interaction, on positive and negative affect. After completing measures of psychological anxiety and nature relatedness, participants ( N = 294 university students) were presented with 15 audiovisual recordings varying in the proportion of natural vs. urban visual scenes and soundscapes. Recordings were taken from sites around their university campus. Participants indicated their positive and negative affect while viewing each audiovisual clip for a duration of 60 s. The interaction between visual and auditory modalities significantly predicted positive and negative affect. Areas of high visual nature and low anthropogenic noise were associated with higher positive affect and lower negative affect. In contrast, participants had higher negative affect in areas with high visual nature paired with high anthropogenic noise. Furthermore, there were individual participant differences, such that the higher an individual's nature relatedness, the greater the effect of visual nature and anthropogenic noise on both positive and negative affect. Finally, individuals high in state anxiety showed the greatest increase in negative affect with reducing visual nature. Synthesis and applications . Our data suggest that anthropogenic noise is detrimental to the effects of visual nature exposure on mood, even (and especially) when visual nature is highest, highlighting the importance of multisensory interactions on mood. Furthermore, the emotional effects of exposure to nature are exaggerated for individuals with high nature relatedness, and (to an extent) for those experiencing high anxiety, highlighting the importance of considering multisensory nature experience when designing ‘wellbeing‐in‐nature’ interventions for these groups. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70157
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How multisensory nature exposure affects well‐being: Visual and auditory influences on affect

Alice Eldridge, Charlotte L. Rae, Christopher J. Sandom, Alaa Aldoh et al.
2 citations
People and Nature
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
article

How multisensory nature exposure affects well‐being: Visual and auditory influences on affect

Alice Eldridge, Charlotte L. Rae, Christopher J. Sandom, Alaa Aldoh, Raul Ungureanu, Sofia Popescu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Human landscapes are increasingly diverse, and natural and urban features can coexist in one setting. Though the positive effects of nature exposure on human well‐being indices are well known, we understand less about how mixed environments, with their associated multisensory dimensions, influence well‐being. To explore this gap, we investigated the effects of visual and auditory nature exposure, and their interaction, on positive and negative affect. After completing measures of psychological anxiety and nature relatedness, participants ( N = 294 university students) were presented with 15 audiovisual recordings varying in the proportion of natural vs. urban visual scenes and soundscapes. Recordings were taken from sites around their university campus. Participants indicated their positive and negative affect while viewing each audiovisual clip for a duration of 60 s. The interaction between visual and auditory modalities significantly predicted positive and negative affect. Areas of high visual nature and low anthropogenic noise were associated with higher positive affect and lower negative affect. In contrast, participants had higher negative affect in areas with high visual nature paired with high anthropogenic noise. Furthermore, there were individual participant differences, such that the higher an individual's nature relatedness, the greater the effect of visual nature and anthropogenic noise on both positive and negative affect. Finally, individuals high in state anxiety showed the greatest increase in negative affect with reducing visual nature. Synthesis and applications . Our data suggest that anthropogenic noise is detrimental to the effects of visual nature exposure on mood, even (and especially) when visual nature is highest, highlighting the importance of multisensory interactions on mood. Furthermore, the emotional effects of exposure to nature are exaggerated for individuals with high nature relatedness, and (to an extent) for those experiencing high anxiety, highlighting the importance of considering multisensory nature experience when designing ‘wellbeing‐in‐nature’ interventions for these groups. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 7(11)
University of Sussex (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Urban Green Space and Health
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.