INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS IN QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS: EFFECTS ON GRADUATE STUDENTS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING AND MINDSET

This study investigates the impact of researcher-developed instructional materials for quantitative data analysis on the reflective thinking skills and mindset of graduate students in Mathematics Education at Central Mindanao University. Employing a one-group pretest-posttest design, 34 students participated in the intervention during the 2023–2024 academic year. Results revealed a statistically significant increase in reflective thinking scores (mean: 4.01 to 4.12, p = .026) and in the intelligence subscale of mindset (mean: 10.88 to 11.88, p = .027). While the character subscale also improved (mean: 11.79 to 12.35), this change was not statistically significant (p = .136). The findings suggest that targeted instructional materials can enhance both reflective thinking and growth mindset, particularly in the domain of intelligence, among graduate students studying quantitative data analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Apllied Mathematics
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v38i4s.280
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS IN QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS: EFFECTS ON GRADUATE STUDENTS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING AND MINDSET

Jenyliza T. Ucang
International Journal of Apllied Mathematics
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS IN QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS: EFFECTS ON GRADUATE STUDENTS’ REFLECTIVE THINKING AND MINDSET

Jenyliza T. Ucang
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of researcher-developed instructional materials for quantitative data analysis on the reflective thinking skills and mindset of graduate students in Mathematics Education at Central Mindanao University. Employing a one-group pretest-posttest design, 34 students participated in the intervention during the 2023–2024 academic year. Results revealed a statistically significant increase in reflective thinking scores (mean: 4.01 to 4.12, p = .026) and in the intelligence subscale of mindset (mean: 10.88 to 11.88, p = .027). While the character subscale also improved (mean: 11.79 to 12.35), this change was not statistically significant (p = .136). The findings suggest that targeted instructional materials can enhance both reflective thinking and growth mindset, particularly in the domain of intelligence, among graduate students studying quantitative data analysis.

International Journal of Apllied MathematicsVol. 38(4s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.