Effectiveness of the Trigger Tool Approach in Identifying Adverse Drug Reactions: A Study at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Background: Patients in tertiary care hospitals are often affected by significant ADRs that increase illness and the duration of their hospital stays. Often such systems neglect to detect many ADRs for two reasons: people do not report them and their observers have biases. By using Trigger Tool, designed by the IHI, clinicians can proactively recognize ADRs with the help of several clinical, laboratory and prescription-based indicators. Aim: To evaluate how well the Trigger Tool works in finding adverse drug reactions, relative to the way adverse events are reported by health personnel. Methods: The study was designed as prospective, cross-sectional research at Department of Pharmacology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Bihta, Patna, Bihar, India for one year. Using a modified Trigger Tool checklist, we screened 200 inpatients who had been admitted to the hospital to find incidents to review. Causality of the identified triggers was assessed using the WHO-UMC causality scale, the Naranjo algorithm, Hartwig and Siegel’s severity scale and Scheumock and Thornton’s preventability assessment. ADRs reported spontaneously by people using the drug were also recorded to check for similar results. Results: 200 patients examined, 67 had signs that suggested an ADR and a detailed review confirmed 51 ADRs. Among all ADRs confirmed, more than half were considered possible (54.9%) and the severity was mostly listed as moderate (64.7%). 43.1% of the ADRs in the study were tagged as preventable. Meanwhile, the spontaneous reporting system captured 21 reports of ADRs during those six months and had both fewer moderate-to-severe cases and lower preventability rates (19.0%). Conclusion: The Trigger Tool method was far better than spontaneous reporting at finding both the number and clinical importance of ADRs. It is a useful tool for improving patient safety and improving pharmacovigilance practices in healthcare settings with limited resources since it can find preventable and moderate-to-severe ADRs

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25258/ijpqa.16.5.24
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of the Trigger Tool Approach in Identifying Adverse Drug Reactions: A Study at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Mehre Darakhshan Mehdi
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Effectiveness of the Trigger Tool Approach in Identifying Adverse Drug Reactions: A Study at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Mehre Darakhshan Mehdi
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients in tertiary care hospitals are often affected by significant ADRs that increase illness and the duration of their hospital stays. Often such systems neglect to detect many ADRs for two reasons: people do not report them and their observers have biases. By using Trigger Tool, designed by the IHI, clinicians can proactively recognize ADRs with the help of several clinical, laboratory and prescription-based indicators. Aim: To evaluate how well the Trigger Tool works in finding adverse drug reactions, relative to the way adverse events are reported by health personnel. Methods: The study was designed as prospective, cross-sectional research at Department of Pharmacology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Bihta, Patna, Bihar, India for one year. Using a modified Trigger Tool checklist, we screened 200 inpatients who had been admitted to the hospital to find incidents to review. Causality of the identified triggers was assessed using the WHO-UMC causality scale, the Naranjo algorithm, Hartwig and Siegel’s severity scale and Scheumock and Thornton’s preventability assessment. ADRs reported spontaneously by people using the drug were also recorded to check for similar results. Results: 200 patients examined, 67 had signs that suggested an ADR and a detailed review confirmed 51 ADRs. Among all ADRs confirmed, more than half were considered possible (54.9%) and the severity was mostly listed as moderate (64.7%). 43.1% of the ADRs in the study were tagged as preventable. Meanwhile, the spontaneous reporting system captured 21 reports of ADRs during those six months and had both fewer moderate-to-severe cases and lower preventability rates (19.0%). Conclusion: The Trigger Tool method was far better than spontaneous reporting at finding both the number and clinical importance of ADRs. It is a useful tool for improving patient safety and improving pharmacovigilance practices in healthcare settings with limited resources since it can find preventable and moderate-to-severe ADRs

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Patna Medical College and Hospital (IN), Nalanda Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.