“I never felt that I could open up about things”: Exploring how menstruation stigma is enacted in menstrual health conversations

Menstruation is constructed as taboo, resulting in hyper-vigilance and self-policing to avoid breaching societal norms that require concealment. This research explores menstruation stigma is enacted in discussions around menstrual health both socially and with healthcare professionals. Reflexive thematic analysis of 45 semi-structured interviews with menstruating women, provides insights into the complex interplay between hegemonic femininity and menstrual stigma in how women approach menstrual health conversations with each other and healthcare providers. Results illustrated how enacted stigma as well as internalisation of stigma and hegemonic femininity contributed to participants’ sense of anticipated stigma, which inhibited their ability to communicate openly about menstruation outside of close informal support networks. Stigma experiences eroded participants’ trust in healthcare providers, and resulted in self-censorship in conversations about menstruation more broadly. However, the research also shows how empowering positive healthcare interactions can be, and a number of participants engaged in menstrual activism by resisting menstrual taboo. By highlighting the experiences of young women in menstrual health communication, this research contributes to our understanding of the pervasive impact of menstrual stigma and patriarchal norms of femininity, while shedding light on the potential to harness change through supportive healthcare interactions and everyday menstrual activism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dup9c_v2
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I never felt that I could open up about things”: Exploring how menstruation stigma is enacted in menstrual health conversations

Annemiek Harder, Sarah E. Stutterheim, Virginia Braun, Lilith A. Whiley et al.
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

“I never felt that I could open up about things”: Exploring how menstruation stigma is enacted in menstrual health conversations

Annemiek Harder, Sarah E. Stutterheim, Virginia Braun, Lilith A. Whiley, Maeve O’Keeffe
article en

Abstract

Menstruation is constructed as taboo, resulting in hyper-vigilance and self-policing to avoid breaching societal norms that require concealment. This research explores menstruation stigma is enacted in discussions around menstrual health both socially and with healthcare professionals. Reflexive thematic analysis of 45 semi-structured interviews with menstruating women, provides insights into the complex interplay between hegemonic femininity and menstrual stigma in how women approach menstrual health conversations with each other and healthcare providers. Results illustrated how enacted stigma as well as internalisation of stigma and hegemonic femininity contributed to participants’ sense of anticipated stigma, which inhibited their ability to communicate openly about menstruation outside of close informal support networks. Stigma experiences eroded participants’ trust in healthcare providers, and resulted in self-censorship in conversations about menstruation more broadly. However, the research also shows how empowering positive healthcare interactions can be, and a number of participants engaged in menstrual activism by resisting menstrual taboo. By highlighting the experiences of young women in menstrual health communication, this research contributes to our understanding of the pervasive impact of menstrual stigma and patriarchal norms of femininity, while shedding light on the potential to harness change through supportive healthcare interactions and everyday menstrual activism.

University of Sussex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“I never felt that I could open up about things”: Exploring how menstruation stigma is enacted in menstrual health conversations — Annemiek Harder, Sarah E. Stutterheim, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS