Do political ideology and polarization place a discount on M&A premiums?

• Examine the impact of election-year ideology and polarization on M&A premiums. • Premiums are higher in left-leaning countries and lower in right-leaning ones. • Extreme polarization and close-call elections do not affect M&A premiums. • Investors incorporate target-country ideology into M&A deal valuations. This study investigates whether M&A premiums are influenced during election years by a country’s political ideology, the degree of political polarization, and the presence of closely contested elections. Using a dataset spanning from 2000 to 2022, comprising 1646 announced deals in election years across 29 countries, we find that political ideology significantly affects M&A premiums. Premiums tend to be lower in countries leaning to the right and higher in those left-leaning ones. However, these effects are not driven by political polarization at ideological extremes, by narrowly decided elections, or by the polarization level of the acquirer’s country. Overall, our findings suggest that investors incorporate the political orientation of the target country into their valuation of M&A deals during election years.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108575
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do political ideology and polarization place a discount on M&A premiums?

Víctor Barros, Kuan Hon Cheang, Cristina Gaio, Tiago Gonçalves
Finance research letters
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Do political ideology and polarization place a discount on M&A premiums?

Víctor Barros, Kuan Hon Cheang, Cristina Gaio, Tiago Gonçalves
article en

Abstract

• Examine the impact of election-year ideology and polarization on M&A premiums. • Premiums are higher in left-leaning countries and lower in right-leaning ones. • Extreme polarization and close-call elections do not affect M&A premiums. • Investors incorporate target-country ideology into M&A deal valuations. This study investigates whether M&A premiums are influenced during election years by a country’s political ideology, the degree of political polarization, and the presence of closely contested elections. Using a dataset spanning from 2000 to 2022, comprising 1646 announced deals in election years across 29 countries, we find that political ideology significantly affects M&A premiums. Premiums tend to be lower in countries leaning to the right and higher in those left-leaning ones. However, these effects are not driven by political polarization at ideological extremes, by narrowly decided elections, or by the polarization level of the acquirer’s country. Overall, our findings suggest that investors incorporate the political orientation of the target country into their valuation of M&A deals during election years.

Finance research lettersVol. 86
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do political ideology and polarization place a discount on M&A premiums? — Víctor Barros, Kuan Hon Cheang, et al. · Finance research letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS