Probing missing data in population-based longitudinal studies: A tutorial and application using R

A common challenge in longitudinal population-based research is the amount of incomplete and missing data that occurs for failing to complete the protocol, as well as potential loss to follow-up overtime. These types of missingness in a dataset can lead to problems such as biases in parameter estimates and loss of power during statistical testing, and ultimately, interpretation of findings. Yet, few studies report key information about missingness in their sample. Moreover, while a breadth of information already exists on the types of missingness and potential methods for handling missingness, the field lacks details on how to conduct a missingness analysis in a real-world setting. In this tutorial, we illustrate key steps in handling missing data and provide an opportunity for researchers to practice appropriate steps in identifying the magnitude and patterns of missing data, as well as assess both selection and retention bias. We utilize a large publicly available longitudinal pediatric population-based study with a focus on air pollution as the primary exposure and a type of emotional health behavior, known as internalization, as the outcome. We provide the reproducible R code for researchers to be able to easily adapt to their own longitudinal observational study.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ajzyh_v1
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probing missing data in population-based longitudinal studies: A tutorial and application using R

Megan M. Herting, Hedyeh Ahmadi, Gagandeep Singh
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Probing missing data in population-based longitudinal studies: A tutorial and application using R

Megan M. Herting, Hedyeh Ahmadi, Gagandeep Singh
article en

Abstract

A common challenge in longitudinal population-based research is the amount of incomplete and missing data that occurs for failing to complete the protocol, as well as potential loss to follow-up overtime. These types of missingness in a dataset can lead to problems such as biases in parameter estimates and loss of power during statistical testing, and ultimately, interpretation of findings. Yet, few studies report key information about missingness in their sample. Moreover, while a breadth of information already exists on the types of missingness and potential methods for handling missingness, the field lacks details on how to conduct a missingness analysis in a real-world setting. In this tutorial, we illustrate key steps in handling missing data and provide an opportunity for researchers to practice appropriate steps in identifying the magnitude and patterns of missing data, as well as assess both selection and retention bias. We utilize a large publicly available longitudinal pediatric population-based study with a focus on air pollution as the primary exposure and a type of emotional health behavior, known as internalization, as the outcome. We provide the reproducible R code for researchers to be able to easily adapt to their own longitudinal observational study.

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.