Unelected institutions and their role in political decision-making: Russia and Egypt as a model

This study explores the role of unelected institutions in political decision-making within authoritarian regimes. These institutions—including the military, security agencies, senior bureaucracies, appointed judiciaries, and official religious bodies—serve as key actors in shaping public policy and reinforcing regime durability, often at the expense of popular will. Using analytical frameworks such as elite theory and the concept of the deep state, the research examines the mechanisms through which these institutions exert influence. Case studies from Russia, Egypt illustrate how unelected bodies operate across different authoritarian contexts. The study concludes that such institutions undermine democratic accountability, obstruct political reform, and perpetuate closed and centralized power structures. It recommends strengthening civil society, promoting institutional transparency, and curbing the dominance of unelected actors in governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International and Political Journal
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31272/ipj.i64.492
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unelected institutions and their role in political decision-making: Russia and Egypt as a model

Ayat ahmed Salman
The International and Political Journal
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

Unelected institutions and their role in political decision-making: Russia and Egypt as a model

Ayat ahmed Salman
article en

Abstract

This study explores the role of unelected institutions in political decision-making within authoritarian regimes. These institutions—including the military, security agencies, senior bureaucracies, appointed judiciaries, and official religious bodies—serve as key actors in shaping public policy and reinforcing regime durability, often at the expense of popular will. Using analytical frameworks such as elite theory and the concept of the deep state, the research examines the mechanisms through which these institutions exert influence. Case studies from Russia, Egypt illustrate how unelected bodies operate across different authoritarian contexts. The study concludes that such institutions undermine democratic accountability, obstruct political reform, and perpetuate closed and centralized power structures. It recommends strengthening civil society, promoting institutional transparency, and curbing the dominance of unelected actors in governance.

The International and Political JournalVol. 64(64)
Mustansiriyah University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.