Hailstorm prediction and loss assessment using high-resolution hazard and claims data

This study examines hailstorm hazards and losses in the Netherlands by combining high-resolution radar-based maximum expected hail size (MEHS) data, weather station observations, and reanalysis data with a unique agricultural asset-level insurance loss dataset. We analyse hail climatology to identify the spatial and temporal characteristics of hail events and their impacts on agricultural buildings. Using correlation and regression methods, we assess optimal MEHS thresholds and spatial scales for aggregated damage analysis. The findings indicate that a 1.5 cm MEHS threshold with a one-digit postal code level of aggregation provides the strongest correlation with reported losses. In addition, we utilise random forest models to evaluate the predictive power of underlying meteorological variables linked to convective systems, thus identifying potential proxy variables for hailstorm hazard and associated losses. The random forest evaluation shows that models that use ERA5 data have good overall performance. These models consistently prioritise convective-related variables such as convective inhibition (CIN) and convective available potential energy (CAPE), in addition to the less frequent variables such as (dewpoint) temperature and precipitation. Furthermore, using the entire time series of the period of interest, we can first predict hail days and then use a model to identify days with hail large enough to cause significant damage. These insights help to improve hailstorm risk models and inform strategies to mitigate future impacts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric Research
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108501
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hailstorm prediction and loss assessment using high-resolution hazard and claims data

Thomas Schmid, W. J. Wouter Botzen, Toon Haer, Hans de Moel et al.
Atmospheric Research
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Hailstorm prediction and loss assessment using high-resolution hazard and claims data

Thomas Schmid, W. J. Wouter Botzen, Toon Haer, Hans de Moel, Maria del Socorro Fonseca Cerda, D. van Ederen, J.C.J.H. Aerts, Inge M. Wouters
article en

Abstract

This study examines hailstorm hazards and losses in the Netherlands by combining high-resolution radar-based maximum expected hail size (MEHS) data, weather station observations, and reanalysis data with a unique agricultural asset-level insurance loss dataset. We analyse hail climatology to identify the spatial and temporal characteristics of hail events and their impacts on agricultural buildings. Using correlation and regression methods, we assess optimal MEHS thresholds and spatial scales for aggregated damage analysis. The findings indicate that a 1.5 cm MEHS threshold with a one-digit postal code level of aggregation provides the strongest correlation with reported losses. In addition, we utilise random forest models to evaluate the predictive power of underlying meteorological variables linked to convective systems, thus identifying potential proxy variables for hailstorm hazard and associated losses. The random forest evaluation shows that models that use ERA5 data have good overall performance. These models consistently prioritise convective-related variables such as convective inhibition (CIN) and convective available potential energy (CAPE), in addition to the less frequent variables such as (dewpoint) temperature and precipitation. Furthermore, using the entire time series of the period of interest, we can first predict hail days and then use a model to identify days with hail large enough to cause significant damage. These insights help to improve hailstorm risk models and inform strategies to mitigate future impacts.

Atmospheric ResearchVol. 329
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.