Assessing the impact of signal quality on heart rate detection from long-term clinical wrist PPG under varying cardiac rhythms

Reliable heart rate (HR) detection is essential for long-term cardiac monitoring, particularly in hospitalized patients with complex conditions. Due to its optical and non-invasive nature, photoplethysmography (PPG) is inherently susceptible to motion artifacts and noise. These challenges intensify under arrhythmic conditions such as atrial fibrillation (AF), where signal distortions may blur the boundary between poor-quality segments and pathological rhythms, potentially impairing downstream tasks like HR estimation. This study developed a signal quality assessment (SQA) algorithm designed for this high-risk clinical population and evaluated its robustness through HR estimation. We collected 24-hour synchronous PPG and electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings from 49 hospitalized cardiac patients, with all PPG segments manually annotated for quality. External validation was conducted using the MIMIC-IV dataset. To avoid dependence on specific segment lengths or classifier types, we assessed SQA performance using seven machine learning models and four segmentation lengths. The SQA framework was then applied to HR estimation to evaluate clinical utility. We implemented a Standard Deviation of Successive Differences (SDSD)-based peak filtering method and compared it with an autocorrelation-based approach under different cardiac rhythm conditions. Threshold tuning in both SQA classification and SDSD filtering was conducted to explore the balance between data usability and reliable HR estimation. The proposed model achieved an AUROC of 96.1% (Sinus Rhythm (SR) + AF), with 90.6% on MIMIC-IV. Predicted SQA labels closely matched manual annotations, with mean absolute error (MAE) differences of 0.08 bpm (SR+AF), 0.25 bpm (SR), 0.62 bpm (AF), and 0.53 bpm (MIMIC-IV). SDSD reduced MAE by 46.57% for SR+AF, 41.67% for SR, and 49.69% for AF, further demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating SQA into HR estimation workflows. • Developed a signal quality assessment method for high-risk hospitalized PPG recordings. • Clinically validated the method via downstream heart rate estimation accuracy. • Combined handcrafted features, feature selection, and seven classifiers across segment lengths. • Applied SDSD-based filtering and autocorrelation for rhythm-specific HR estimation. • Threshold tuning supports adaptive trade-offs between signal coverage and HR precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108688
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of signal quality on heart rate detection from long-term clinical wrist PPG under varying cardiac rhythms

Arman Anzanpour, Joel Nuotio, Juhani Airaksinen, Matti Kaisti et al.
1 citations
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
0.67
article

Assessing the impact of signal quality on heart rate detection from long-term clinical wrist PPG under varying cardiac rhythms

Arman Anzanpour, Joel Nuotio, Juhani Airaksinen, Matti Kaisti, Jussi Jaakkola, Tero Koivisto, Jonas Sandelin, Arto Relander, Tuija Vasankari, Olli Lahdenoja, Tuomas Kiviniemi, Joonas Lehto, Yingjiang Zhao, Sepehr Seifizarei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reliable heart rate (HR) detection is essential for long-term cardiac monitoring, particularly in hospitalized patients with complex conditions. Due to its optical and non-invasive nature, photoplethysmography (PPG) is inherently susceptible to motion artifacts and noise. These challenges intensify under arrhythmic conditions such as atrial fibrillation (AF), where signal distortions may blur the boundary between poor-quality segments and pathological rhythms, potentially impairing downstream tasks like HR estimation. This study developed a signal quality assessment (SQA) algorithm designed for this high-risk clinical population and evaluated its robustness through HR estimation. We collected 24-hour synchronous PPG and electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings from 49 hospitalized cardiac patients, with all PPG segments manually annotated for quality. External validation was conducted using the MIMIC-IV dataset. To avoid dependence on specific segment lengths or classifier types, we assessed SQA performance using seven machine learning models and four segmentation lengths. The SQA framework was then applied to HR estimation to evaluate clinical utility. We implemented a Standard Deviation of Successive Differences (SDSD)-based peak filtering method and compared it with an autocorrelation-based approach under different cardiac rhythm conditions. Threshold tuning in both SQA classification and SDSD filtering was conducted to explore the balance between data usability and reliable HR estimation. The proposed model achieved an AUROC of 96.1% (Sinus Rhythm (SR) + AF), with 90.6% on MIMIC-IV. Predicted SQA labels closely matched manual annotations, with mean absolute error (MAE) differences of 0.08 bpm (SR+AF), 0.25 bpm (SR), 0.62 bpm (AF), and 0.53 bpm (MIMIC-IV). SDSD reduced MAE by 46.57% for SR+AF, 41.67% for SR, and 49.69% for AF, further demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating SQA into HR estimation workflows. • Developed a signal quality assessment method for high-risk hospitalized PPG recordings. • Clinically validated the method via downstream heart rate estimation accuracy. • Combined handcrafted features, feature selection, and seven classifiers across segment lengths. • Applied SDSD-based filtering and autocorrelation for rhythm-specific HR estimation. • Threshold tuning supports adaptive trade-offs between signal coverage and HR precision.

Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlVol. 112
University of Turku (FI), Turku University Hospital (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.