From climate risk to action: Analysing adaptation decision robustness under uncertainty

Climate adaptation decisions are made under great uncertainty, arising from uncertainties about both the level of climate risk and the attributes of decision options. Decision-makers must understand how uncertainties in the input factors of risk assessment and decision models affect the ultimate adaptation decision, and whether the modelling yields a robust decision, i.e. one that is consistently identified as optimal over a range of uncertain input factors. Here, we present a framework for analysing the robustness of climate adaptation decisions. We apply a Bayesian Decision Analysis framework to determine the optimal output decision in a region based on both climate risk and decision-related attributes. Then, we present an approach for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis on the optimal adaptation decision itself to assess robustness and understand which input factors most influence the decision in a particular region. We demonstrate this framework on an idealised example of adaptation decision-making to mitigate the risk of heat-stress on outdoor physical working capacity in the UK. In this application, we find that regions with high uncertainty in climate risk can still exhibit greater robustness in the optimal decision, and the decision is often more sensitive to variations in decision-related attributes rather than risk-related attributes. Previous research often stops short at assessing uncertainty and sensitivity in climate risk alone. These results highlight the necessity of conducting uncertainty and sensitivity analysis on the ultimate decision output itself in order to understand what factors drive decision robustness. • Adaptation decision-making is based on uncertain climate risk and decision attributes. • Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses typically focus only on climate risk. • We present a framework to analyse adaptation decision robustness and sensitivity. • Decision-makers must explore uncertainty and sensitivity of decisions, not only risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate Risk Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100751
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From climate risk to action: Analysing adaptation decision robustness under uncertainty

Dan Bernie, Cecina Babich Morrow, Laura Dawkins, Francesca Pianosi et al.
1 citations
Climate Risk Management
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
1.40
article

From climate risk to action: Analysing adaptation decision robustness under uncertainty

Dan Bernie, Cecina Babich Morrow, Laura Dawkins, Francesca Pianosi, Dennis Prangle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate adaptation decisions are made under great uncertainty, arising from uncertainties about both the level of climate risk and the attributes of decision options. Decision-makers must understand how uncertainties in the input factors of risk assessment and decision models affect the ultimate adaptation decision, and whether the modelling yields a robust decision, i.e. one that is consistently identified as optimal over a range of uncertain input factors. Here, we present a framework for analysing the robustness of climate adaptation decisions. We apply a Bayesian Decision Analysis framework to determine the optimal output decision in a region based on both climate risk and decision-related attributes. Then, we present an approach for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis on the optimal adaptation decision itself to assess robustness and understand which input factors most influence the decision in a particular region. We demonstrate this framework on an idealised example of adaptation decision-making to mitigate the risk of heat-stress on outdoor physical working capacity in the UK. In this application, we find that regions with high uncertainty in climate risk can still exhibit greater robustness in the optimal decision, and the decision is often more sensitive to variations in decision-related attributes rather than risk-related attributes. Previous research often stops short at assessing uncertainty and sensitivity in climate risk alone. These results highlight the necessity of conducting uncertainty and sensitivity analysis on the ultimate decision output itself in order to understand what factors drive decision robustness. • Adaptation decision-making is based on uncertain climate risk and decision attributes. • Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses typically focus only on climate risk. • We present a framework to analyse adaptation decision robustness and sensitivity. • Decision-makers must explore uncertainty and sensitivity of decisions, not only risk.

Climate Risk ManagementVol. 50
Met Office (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.