Validation of the Italian version of the clinical teaching preference questionnaire in peer-assisted nursing education

• Peer-Assisted Learning is a recognized method in nursing clinical education. • This study validates the Italian version of the CTPQ-IV with strong psychometrics. • The tool enables universities to assess and improve PAL in nursing curricula. Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) is an effective pedagogical strategy in nursing education. Valid instruments are needed to assess students' experiences with PAL in the Italian context. To validate the Italian version of the Clinical Teaching Preference Questionnaire (CTPQ-IV) and examine its psychometric properties among nursing students. A prospective observational study was conducted. The CTPQ-IV was administered to 764 first-year nursing students in simulation laboratories. Data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with Oblique Oblimin rotation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test the factor structure. The majority of participants were female (79.7%) and aged 19–21 years (74.9%). Factor analysis of the 10-item questionnaire revealed a two-factor solution (Peer Supervision and Instructor Supervision), explaining 54.3% of the variance. Factor loadings exceeded ±0.30, and internal consistency was satisfactory. The CFA confirmed the factor structure, supporting the construct validity of the instrument. The Italian version of the CTPQ-IV demonstrated adequate validity and reliability. It represents a practical tool for evaluating PAL in nursing education and supports future educational research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and learning in nursing
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2025.09.004
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Italian version of the clinical teaching preference questionnaire in peer-assisted nursing education

Gianandrea Pasquinelli, Arianna Bagnis, Ivan Rubbi, Valeria Cremonini et al.
Teaching and learning in nursing
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Validation of the Italian version of the clinical teaching preference questionnaire in peer-assisted nursing education

Gianandrea Pasquinelli, Arianna Bagnis, Ivan Rubbi, Valeria Cremonini, Milena Spadola, Katia Mattarozzi, Barbara Biselli, Erica Grisanti, Stefano Bastianini
article en

Abstract

• Peer-Assisted Learning is a recognized method in nursing clinical education. • This study validates the Italian version of the CTPQ-IV with strong psychometrics. • The tool enables universities to assess and improve PAL in nursing curricula. Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) is an effective pedagogical strategy in nursing education. Valid instruments are needed to assess students' experiences with PAL in the Italian context. To validate the Italian version of the Clinical Teaching Preference Questionnaire (CTPQ-IV) and examine its psychometric properties among nursing students. A prospective observational study was conducted. The CTPQ-IV was administered to 764 first-year nursing students in simulation laboratories. Data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with Oblique Oblimin rotation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test the factor structure. The majority of participants were female (79.7%) and aged 19–21 years (74.9%). Factor analysis of the 10-item questionnaire revealed a two-factor solution (Peer Supervision and Instructor Supervision), explaining 54.3% of the variance. Factor loadings exceeded ±0.30, and internal consistency was satisfactory. The CFA confirmed the factor structure, supporting the construct validity of the instrument. The Italian version of the CTPQ-IV demonstrated adequate validity and reliability. It represents a practical tool for evaluating PAL in nursing education and supports future educational research.

Teaching and learning in nursingVol. 21(1)
Ospedale per gli Infermi (IT), Ospedale Infermi di Rimini (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.