Evaluating the Effectiveness of Subjective Questionnaires for Assessing Cognitive Well-Being in Assembly Tasks

Recognizing Industry 5.0’s emphasis on human-centric work, we explored the use of established questionnaires, such as NASA-TLX, SWAT, and IMI, to evaluate cognitive well-being in assembly-like tasks. While expensive and invasive sensors can provide detailed insights, our aim was to determine how effectively existing, accessible questionnaires can detect factors such as boredom, cognitive load, temporal demand, and frustration. This information serves as a relevant contextual resource, enabling manufacturing companies to identify the root causes of well-being threats on the workfloor, particularly those linked to specific tasks. The results demonstrate that these questionnaires can capture key well-being dimensions, making them valuable for industrial settings. This supports their potential as practical, non-invasive tools for monitoring work-related well-being, aligning with the goals of a human-centered industrial future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.166
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Subjective Questionnaires for Assessing Cognitive Well-Being in Assembly Tasks

Eva Geurts, Gustavo Rovelo, Anouk Michiels
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Subjective Questionnaires for Assessing Cognitive Well-Being in Assembly Tasks

Eva Geurts, Gustavo Rovelo, Anouk Michiels
article en

Abstract

Recognizing Industry 5.0’s emphasis on human-centric work, we explored the use of established questionnaires, such as NASA-TLX, SWAT, and IMI, to evaluate cognitive well-being in assembly-like tasks. While expensive and invasive sensors can provide detailed insights, our aim was to determine how effectively existing, accessible questionnaires can detect factors such as boredom, cognitive load, temporal demand, and frustration. This information serves as a relevant contextual resource, enabling manufacturing companies to identify the root causes of well-being threats on the workfloor, particularly those linked to specific tasks. The results demonstrate that these questionnaires can capture key well-being dimensions, making them valuable for industrial settings. This supports their potential as practical, non-invasive tools for monitoring work-related well-being, aligning with the goals of a human-centered industrial future.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(10)
Hasselt University (BE)
Flanders Make, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Subjective Questionnaires for Assessing Cognitive Well-Being in Assembly Tasks — Eva Geurts, Gustavo Rovelo, et al. · IFAC-PapersOnLine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS