Adaptive learning mode comparison for Predictive Maintenance Systems

The industry is increasingly using data-driven predictive maintenance with machine learning to prevent equipment failures. However, manufacturing systems are inherently complex and operate in dynamic, non-stationary environments, leading to the phenomenon of concept drift. Due to edge device limitations, traditional full retraining methods are often impractical, making incremental learning a potential alternative. This study evaluates both approaches through simulated real-world scenarios. Results show that full retraining generally performs better, especially in ideal and degraded conditions. While incremental learning shows acceptable performance with accurate labels and imbalanced datasets, it struggles when dealing with significant labelling inaccuracies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.021
Primary Topic
Data Stream Mining Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive learning mode comparison for Predictive Maintenance Systems

Jérémie Marchand, Jannik Laval, Vincent Cheutet, Aïcha Sekhari et al.
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Data Stream Mining Techniques
article

Adaptive learning mode comparison for Predictive Maintenance Systems

Jérémie Marchand, Jannik Laval, Vincent Cheutet, Aïcha Sekhari, Jean-Baptiste Danielou
article en

Abstract

The industry is increasingly using data-driven predictive maintenance with machine learning to prevent equipment failures. However, manufacturing systems are inherently complex and operate in dynamic, non-stationary environments, leading to the phenomenon of concept drift. Due to edge device limitations, traditional full retraining methods are often impractical, making incremental learning a potential alternative. This study evaluates both approaches through simulated real-world scenarios. Results show that full retraining generally performs better, especially in ideal and degraded conditions. While incremental learning shows acceptable performance with accurate labels and imbalanced datasets, it struggles when dealing with significant labelling inaccuracies.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(10)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Data Stream Mining Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.