Incorporation alfalfa with annual forage enhances even water use and maintains forage yield resilience in a semiarid region

Soil water deficits in deep layers and early senescence are key but neglected issues under continuous monoculture cultivation, limiting crop production in water-limited environments, particularly for perennial crops with relatively high water demand. Whether annual forage crops with shallow roots can be incorporated into intercropping systems to effectively improve soil water distribution via water use compensation is unclear. A field trial with alfalfa and four annual forage crops (maize, sweet sorghum, Sudan grass and Japanese millet) was conducted in a typical semiarid region of the Loess Plateau. Compared with the alfalfa monoculture system, the alfalfa intercropping system with annual forage crops improved the water content of the topsoil (0–30 cm) and subsoil (30–160 cm) by 6.5 %-81.4 % and 10.7 %-23.2 %, respectively. Compared with the other intercropping systems, the alfalfa-maize system greatly reduced interspecific water competition in the subsoil by 16.4 %-27.6 % and increased topsoil water compensation by 0.3 %-13.1 %. This led to an average increase of 29.5 % in water storage in the topsoil and 12.0 % in water storage in the subsoil at the maturity stage. Compared with the alfalfa monoculture system, the alfalfa-maize, alfalfa-sorghum, alfalfa-Sudan grass, and alfalfa-Japanese millet intercropping systems presented 151 %, 44 %, 54 %, and 32 % greater water productivity, respectively. Notably, the improvement in soil water conditions within the intercropping system resulted in greater interspecific compensatory effects than selection effects, thereby conferring a yield advantage of 64.6 %-80.6 %. Moreover, compared with the other intercropping systems, the alfalfa-maize combination resulted in 0.5–7.6 % LER improvement, 13.8–28.8 % MAI enhancement, and 12.3–43.1 % CR reduction, coupled with water compensation benefits and favorable water productivity (WER > 1). Overall, the yield loss of alfalfa intercropped with annual forage crops can be effectively compensated for. This offers a feasible solution for efficient water management by facilitating even water use for perennial forage crops in semiarid regions. • Annual forage intercropping with alfalfa favors subsoil water restoration. • Incorporating annual forage with alfalfa improved water use efficiency. • Compensatory effect outweigh selection effect in intercropping. • Maize/alfalfa is more suitable for creating even soil water profile and forage production in semi-arid regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109838
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incorporation alfalfa with annual forage enhances even water use and maintains forage yield resilience in a semiarid region

Chugang Mei, Hongyan Guo, Shuai Hou, Yanyan Zhang et al.
1 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
article

Incorporation alfalfa with annual forage enhances even water use and maintains forage yield resilience in a semiarid region

Chugang Mei, Hongyan Guo, Shuai Hou, Yanyan Zhang, Yangyang Liu, Zhixin Zhang, Yafang Wang, Kai Gao, Zhou Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soil water deficits in deep layers and early senescence are key but neglected issues under continuous monoculture cultivation, limiting crop production in water-limited environments, particularly for perennial crops with relatively high water demand. Whether annual forage crops with shallow roots can be incorporated into intercropping systems to effectively improve soil water distribution via water use compensation is unclear. A field trial with alfalfa and four annual forage crops (maize, sweet sorghum, Sudan grass and Japanese millet) was conducted in a typical semiarid region of the Loess Plateau. Compared with the alfalfa monoculture system, the alfalfa intercropping system with annual forage crops improved the water content of the topsoil (0–30 cm) and subsoil (30–160 cm) by 6.5 %-81.4 % and 10.7 %-23.2 %, respectively. Compared with the other intercropping systems, the alfalfa-maize system greatly reduced interspecific water competition in the subsoil by 16.4 %-27.6 % and increased topsoil water compensation by 0.3 %-13.1 %. This led to an average increase of 29.5 % in water storage in the topsoil and 12.0 % in water storage in the subsoil at the maturity stage. Compared with the alfalfa monoculture system, the alfalfa-maize, alfalfa-sorghum, alfalfa-Sudan grass, and alfalfa-Japanese millet intercropping systems presented 151 %, 44 %, 54 %, and 32 % greater water productivity, respectively. Notably, the improvement in soil water conditions within the intercropping system resulted in greater interspecific compensatory effects than selection effects, thereby conferring a yield advantage of 64.6 %-80.6 %. Moreover, compared with the other intercropping systems, the alfalfa-maize combination resulted in 0.5–7.6 % LER improvement, 13.8–28.8 % MAI enhancement, and 12.3–43.1 % CR reduction, coupled with water compensation benefits and favorable water productivity (WER > 1). Overall, the yield loss of alfalfa intercropped with annual forage crops can be effectively compensated for. This offers a feasible solution for efficient water management by facilitating even water use for perennial forage crops in semiarid regions. • Annual forage intercropping with alfalfa favors subsoil water restoration. • Incorporating annual forage with alfalfa improved water use efficiency. • Compensatory effect outweigh selection effect in intercropping. • Maize/alfalfa is more suitable for creating even soil water profile and forage production in semi-arid regions.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 320
North West Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), People's Government of Shaanxi Province (CN), Jilin Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.