Human Factors in Operations Management: Comparative Perspectives on Decision Support Models

The integration of human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) into industrial and operational decision support modeling has grown rapidly over the past decade. In particular, physical aspects (e.g., physical workload, fatigue-recovery cycles) have been popular in developing human-centered solutions in operations management (OM). These solutions aim, first, to prevent both short- and long-term health issues among workers (e.g., work overload and occupational musculoskeletal disorders) and, second, to enhance the system performance of model-based solutions in real-world settings. However, adopting a human-centric perspective necessitates interdisciplinary knowledge. Specifically, each model or tool developed by ergonomists possesses unique characteristics (including the original experimental settings, the scope of collected data, and the intended application scenarios). They should thus be used with caution in managerial decision support models. To facilitate the knowledge transfer from HF/E to OM, this pilot study provides preliminary results of: (i) a scoping review of the integration of physical HF into decision support modeling in operations management; (ii) a critical evaluation of model assumptions and the interpretation of results from an HF/E perspective; and (iii) the development of a structural framework to suggest HF/E model choices. The current study presents preliminary results with an interdisciplinary perspective, which will be extended in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.131
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Factors in Operations Management: Comparative Perspectives on Decision Support Models

Minqi Zhang, Eric H. Grosse, Patrick Neumann
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Human Factors in Operations Management: Comparative Perspectives on Decision Support Models

Minqi Zhang, Eric H. Grosse, Patrick Neumann
article en

Abstract

The integration of human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) into industrial and operational decision support modeling has grown rapidly over the past decade. In particular, physical aspects (e.g., physical workload, fatigue-recovery cycles) have been popular in developing human-centered solutions in operations management (OM). These solutions aim, first, to prevent both short- and long-term health issues among workers (e.g., work overload and occupational musculoskeletal disorders) and, second, to enhance the system performance of model-based solutions in real-world settings. However, adopting a human-centric perspective necessitates interdisciplinary knowledge. Specifically, each model or tool developed by ergonomists possesses unique characteristics (including the original experimental settings, the scope of collected data, and the intended application scenarios). They should thus be used with caution in managerial decision support models. To facilitate the knowledge transfer from HF/E to OM, this pilot study provides preliminary results of: (i) a scoping review of the integration of physical HF into decision support modeling in operations management; (ii) a critical evaluation of model assumptions and the interpretation of results from an HF/E perspective; and (iii) the development of a structural framework to suggest HF/E model choices. The current study presents preliminary results with an interdisciplinary perspective, which will be extended in future research.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(10)
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), Saarland University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.