Lean vs resilient supply chain: in search of the tipping point and synergies

Lean principles such as just-in-time and single sourcing have been proven to increase supply chain efficiency. Multiple crises such as COVID-19 pandemic and global semiconductor shortages have revealed fragility of lean supply chains when facing disruptions. Most of the recent research on supply chain resilience suggests moving away from lean and building redundancies to cope with disruptions. While the redundancies such as extra inventory, backup sourcing, and capacity reservations can help protect the supply chains and ensure operations continuity in the presence of disruptions, they might adversely affect efficiency. In these settings, two important questions arise: (i) do lean and resilience contradict each other? and (ii) can lean and resilience complement each other? In other words, we are asking a question if a supply chain can be both efficient and resilient. In this paper, conceptual frameworks AURA (active usage of resilience assets) and LCN (Low-Certainty-Need Supply Chain) which articulated the concept of lean resilience are extended toward the notion of a tipping point between lean and resilient. We propose a formal model that can be used to identify a combination of lean and resilience measures in the supply chain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.015
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lean vs resilient supply chain: in search of the tipping point and synergies

Марина Іванова
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Lean vs resilient supply chain: in search of the tipping point and synergies

Марина Іванова
article en

Abstract

Lean principles such as just-in-time and single sourcing have been proven to increase supply chain efficiency. Multiple crises such as COVID-19 pandemic and global semiconductor shortages have revealed fragility of lean supply chains when facing disruptions. Most of the recent research on supply chain resilience suggests moving away from lean and building redundancies to cope with disruptions. While the redundancies such as extra inventory, backup sourcing, and capacity reservations can help protect the supply chains and ensure operations continuity in the presence of disruptions, they might adversely affect efficiency. In these settings, two important questions arise: (i) do lean and resilience contradict each other? and (ii) can lean and resilience complement each other? In other words, we are asking a question if a supply chain can be both efficient and resilient. In this paper, conceptual frameworks AURA (active usage of resilience assets) and LCN (Low-Certainty-Need Supply Chain) which articulated the concept of lean resilience are extended toward the notion of a tipping point between lean and resilient. We propose a formal model that can be used to identify a combination of lean and resilience measures in the supply chain.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(10)
Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.