From promises to action: Analyzing global commitments to tackle hunger and food insecurity

• The world is off-track to ending hunger and food insecurity (SDG2) by 2030. • Multiple intergovernmental meetings occur annually related to SDG2. • We analyze 148 declarations from ten global fora related to SDG2 and held between 2015 and 2023. • Commitments to scalable actions, financing plans, and accountability are weak. • Improved global governance structures addressing actor roles and interests are needed. High-level declarations and commitment statements are a common output of global, intergovernmental meetings and critical to their continued public legitimacy. Yet, to what extent have such statements served as roadmaps for concrete action? To address this question, this paper focuses on commitments to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2, which aims to end hunger, achieve food security, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030. Using a structured framework with seven domains, we analyzed 148 intergovernmental commitment documents emerging from 78 global meetings focused on SDG2 and organized by ten different global bodies between 2015 and 2023. We find that stated visions to address SDG2 increasingly have been emphasized at global meetings over time but that specific actions to accelerate progress towards SDG2 were weaker. For instance, we find few examples of how needed actions will be scaled up over time, how financing might be mobilized, and how to strengthen horizontal (i.e. multi-sectoral) and vertical (i.e. multi-level) policy coherence. Progress reports are often identified as the main tool for providing public accountability, but there rarely are any consequences to governments for failure to uphold their commitments. We offer several policy recommendations emanating from the analysis, including the need to institutionalize monitoring of SDG2 commitments—not just targets—in the next five years, and a better understanding of political economy factors that may inhibit global decisions from translating into national policy decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102968
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From promises to action: Analyzing global commitments to tackle hunger and food insecurity

Rob Vos, Christina Zorbas, Elyse Iruhiriye, Ε. L. Jones et al.
3 citations
Food Policy
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
8.45
article

From promises to action: Analyzing global commitments to tackle hunger and food insecurity

Rob Vos, Christina Zorbas, Elyse Iruhiriye, Ε. L. Jones, Danielle Resnick, Derek Headey, Will Martin, Purnima Menon, Shoba Suri
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• The world is off-track to ending hunger and food insecurity (SDG2) by 2030. • Multiple intergovernmental meetings occur annually related to SDG2. • We analyze 148 declarations from ten global fora related to SDG2 and held between 2015 and 2023. • Commitments to scalable actions, financing plans, and accountability are weak. • Improved global governance structures addressing actor roles and interests are needed. High-level declarations and commitment statements are a common output of global, intergovernmental meetings and critical to their continued public legitimacy. Yet, to what extent have such statements served as roadmaps for concrete action? To address this question, this paper focuses on commitments to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2, which aims to end hunger, achieve food security, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030. Using a structured framework with seven domains, we analyzed 148 intergovernmental commitment documents emerging from 78 global meetings focused on SDG2 and organized by ten different global bodies between 2015 and 2023. We find that stated visions to address SDG2 increasingly have been emphasized at global meetings over time but that specific actions to accelerate progress towards SDG2 were weaker. For instance, we find few examples of how needed actions will be scaled up over time, how financing might be mobilized, and how to strengthen horizontal (i.e. multi-sectoral) and vertical (i.e. multi-level) policy coherence. Progress reports are often identified as the main tool for providing public accountability, but there rarely are any consequences to governments for failure to uphold their commitments. We offer several policy recommendations emanating from the analysis, including the need to institutionalize monitoring of SDG2 commitments—not just targets—in the next five years, and a better understanding of political economy factors that may inhibit global decisions from translating into national policy decisions.

Food PolicyVol. 136
Deakin University (AU), International Food Policy Research Institute (US), Observer Research Foundation (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.