Alternative Conformation Prediction Using Deep Learning With Multi‐ <scp>MSA</scp> Strategy and Structural Clustering in <scp>CASP16</scp>

We report the results from the "MIEnsembles-Server" and "Zheng" groups for structure ensemble predictions in CASP16, both of which employed the EnsembleFold pipeline. Initially, multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) were generated using DeepMSA2 for proteins and rMSA for RNA targets. These MSAs were processed by newly developed deep learning methods-D-I-TASSER2 for protein monomer structure prediction, DMFold2 for protein complex structure prediction, ExFold for RNA structure prediction, and DeepProtNA for protein-nucleic acid complex structure prediction-to yield diverse structural decoys. The generated decoys were clustered into representative models corresponding to distinct conformational states using the structural clustering tool MolClust. Protein monomer targets underwent additional refinement via replica-exchange Monte Carlo (REMC) simulations with D-I-TASSER2, and these refined decoys were re-clustered with MolClust to finalize the ensemble predictions. For the 19 ensemble targets in CASP16, the final EnsembleFold models achieved an average TM-score of 0.657, representing improvements of 10.2% compared to the baseline AlphaFold3 program. Notably, EnsembleFold achieved particularly good performance for hybrid protein/nucleic-acid targets, leading to its efficacy in ensemble prediction tasks. Analysis of the resulting structural ensembles highlighted three significant insights: (i) Models derived from distinct DeepMSA2-generated MSAs typically represent different conformational states for ensemble targets; (ii) REMC simulations significantly enhance model diversity, facilitating the identification of alternative conformations; (iii) The structural clustering approach effectively identifies and selects accurate representative models for each conformational state. We further discuss potential improvements in Quality Assessment (QA) scoring methods that could further enhance the reliability and accuracy of ensemble predictions in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70059
Primary Topic
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternative Conformation Prediction Using Deep Learning With Multi‐ MSA Strategy and Structural Clustering in CASP16

Xiaogen Zhou, Lydia Freddolino, Weiyi Ni, Qiqige Wuyun et al.
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
article

Alternative Conformation Prediction Using Deep Learning With Multi‐ MSA Strategy and Structural Clustering in CASP16

Xiaogen Zhou, Lydia Freddolino, Weiyi Ni, Qiqige Wuyun, Chunxiang Peng, Gang Hu, Quancheng Liu, Wei Zheng, Ziying Zhang
article en

Abstract

We report the results from the "MIEnsembles-Server" and "Zheng" groups for structure ensemble predictions in CASP16, both of which employed the EnsembleFold pipeline. Initially, multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) were generated using DeepMSA2 for proteins and rMSA for RNA targets. These MSAs were processed by newly developed deep learning methods-D-I-TASSER2 for protein monomer structure prediction, DMFold2 for protein complex structure prediction, ExFold for RNA structure prediction, and DeepProtNA for protein-nucleic acid complex structure prediction-to yield diverse structural decoys. The generated decoys were clustered into representative models corresponding to distinct conformational states using the structural clustering tool MolClust. Protein monomer targets underwent additional refinement via replica-exchange Monte Carlo (REMC) simulations with D-I-TASSER2, and these refined decoys were re-clustered with MolClust to finalize the ensemble predictions. For the 19 ensemble targets in CASP16, the final EnsembleFold models achieved an average TM-score of 0.657, representing improvements of 10.2% compared to the baseline AlphaFold3 program. Notably, EnsembleFold achieved particularly good performance for hybrid protein/nucleic-acid targets, leading to its efficacy in ensemble prediction tasks. Analysis of the resulting structural ensembles highlighted three significant insights: (i) Models derived from distinct DeepMSA2-generated MSAs typically represent different conformational states for ensemble targets; (ii) REMC simulations significantly enhance model diversity, facilitating the identification of alternative conformations; (iii) The structural clustering approach effectively identifies and selects accurate representative models for each conformational state. We further discuss potential improvements in Quality Assessment (QA) scoring methods that could further enhance the reliability and accuracy of ensemble predictions in the future.

Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsVol. 94(1)
Nankai University (CN), University of Michigan (US), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.